» Articles » PMID: 35278172

Gamified Neurorehabilitation Strategies for Post-stroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Advantages

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Mar 12
PMID 35278172
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: Stroke is the leading cause of permanent motor disability in the United States (US), but there has been little progress in developing novel, effective strategies for treating post-stroke motor deficits. The past decade has seen the rapid development of many promising, gamified neurorehabilitation technologies; however, clinical adoption remains limited. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the recent literature surrounding the adoption and use of gamification in neurorehabilitation after stroke.

Recent Findings: Gamification of neurorehabilitation protocols is both feasible and effective. Deployment strategies and scalability need to be addressed with more rigor. Relationship between engaged time on task and rehabilitation outcomes should be explored further as it may create benefits beyond repetitive movement. As gamification becomes a more common and feasible way of delivering exercise-based therapies, additional benefits of gamification are emerging. In spite of this, questions still exist about scalability and widespread clinical adoption.

Citing Articles

Clinical validation of an individualized auto-adaptative serious game for combined cognitive and upper limb motor robotic rehabilitation after stroke.

Doumas I, Lejeune T, Edwards M, Stoquart G, Vandermeeren Y, Dehez B J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):10.

PMID: 39849588 PMC: 11756148. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01551-w.


Advancing public health through technological rehabilitation: insights from a national clinician survey.

Capecci M, Gandolfi M, Straudi S, Calabro R, Baldini N, Pepa L BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1626.

PMID: 39702315 PMC: 11660639. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11991-0.


The Use of Extrinsic Performance Feedback and Reward to Enhance Upper Limb Motor Behavior and Recovery Post-Stroke: A Scoping Review.

Palidis D, Gardiner Z, Stephenson A, Zhang K, Boruff J, Fellows L Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024; 39(2):157-173.

PMID: 39659261 PMC: 11849245. DOI: 10.1177/15459683241298262.


The effectiveness of theta burst stimulation for motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review.

Fu Y, Wang C, Zhang L, Ji D, Xiang A, Qi J Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):568.

PMID: 39609900 PMC: 11605871. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-02170-2.


Stroke rehabilitation: from diagnosis to therapy.

Li X, He Y, Wang D, Rezaei M Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1402729.

PMID: 39193145 PMC: 11347453. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1402729.


References
1.
Maier M, Ballester B, Verschure P . Principles of Neurorehabilitation After Stroke Based on Motor Learning and Brain Plasticity Mechanisms. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020; 13:74. PMC: 6928101. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00074. View

2.
Decety J, Jeannerod M . Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery?. Behav Brain Res. 1995; 72(1-2):127-34. DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00141-6. View

3.
Saposnik G, Teasell R, Mamdani M, Hall J, McIlroy W, Cheung D . Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke. 2010; 41(7):1477-84. PMC: 4879973. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584979. View

4.
Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs H, van Wijck F, Howel D, Wilson N . Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019; 394(10192):51-62. PMC: 6620612. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31055-4. View

5.
Sardi L, Idri A, Fernandez-Aleman J . A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. J Biomed Inform. 2017; 71:31-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.011. View