» Articles » PMID: 35277650

Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in People with Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Spinal Cord
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Mar 12
PMID 35277650
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Meta-analysis.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in people with pain after spinal cord injury by meta-analysis.

Methods: Reviewed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, as well as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Vip databases to search the randomized controlled trials of pain after spinal cord injury through transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation from the beginning of the library to March 2021, and analyze the literature with RevMan 5.3 software and the bias in the literature with STATA 12.0 software.

Results: There are six randomized controlled trials in the study with 165 cases. 83 cases in the test group were given transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and 82 cases in the control group used sham stimulation or other treatments. Meta-analysis results showed the experimental group's visual analog scale (MD = -1.52, 95%CI, -2.44 to -0.60, P = 0.001) and short-form McGill pain questionnaire scores (MD = -0.70, 95% CI, -1.03 to -0.25, P = 0.002) were lower than those of the control group.

Conclusions: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation has some clinical therapeutic effects on persons with pain after spinal cord injury, but due to the lack of literature, the sample size is not large, and clinical trials need to be further improved later.

Citing Articles

Composition of the editorial staff of major spinal journals based on geo-economic background: A survey analysis.

Jia Z, Liu D, Li X, Wen T, Zhao X, Li W Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e28541.

PMID: 38689993 PMC: 11059504. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28541.


Narrative review of current neuromodulation modalities for spinal cord injury.

Medina R, Ho A, Reddy R, Chen J, Castellanos J Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023; 4:1143405.

PMID: 36969918 PMC: 10033643. DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1143405.

References
1.
Zhou M, Li F, Lu W, Wu J, Pei S . Efficiency of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation on Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018; 99(9):1730-1739. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.020. View

2.
Zhiyuan W, Ming Y, Jie J, Yi W, Tiansheng H, Mingfen L . Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at acupoints on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. J Tradit Chin Med. 2015; 35(2):134-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0254-6272(15)30020-0. View

3.
Raichle K, Hanley M, Jensen M, Cardenas D . Cognitions, coping, and social environment predict adjustment to pain in spinal cord injury. J Pain. 2007; 8(9):718-29. PMC: 2045649. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.006. View

4.
Sawant A, Dadurka K, Overend T, Kremenchutzky M . Systematic review of efficacy of TENS for management of central pain in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015; 4(3):219-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.03.006. View

5.
Bostock H, Campero M, Serra J, Ochoa J . Temperature-dependent double spikes in C-nociceptors of neuropathic pain patients. Brain. 2005; 128(Pt 9):2154-63. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh552. View