» Articles » PMID: 35271155

Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35271155
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify and summarize biomechanical assessment approaches in interlimb coordination on poststroke gait. Introduction: Interlimb coordination involves complex neurophysiological mechanisms that can be expressed through the biomechanical output. The deepening of this concept would have a significant contribution in gait rehabilitation in patients with an asymmetric neurological impairment as poststroke adults. Inclusion criteria: Poststroke adults (>19 years old), with assessment of interlimb coordination during gait, in an open context, according to the Population, Concept, Context framework. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science™, Scopus, and gray literature in Google Scholar™, according to the PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Studies written in Portuguese or English language and published between database inception and 14 November 2021 were included. Qualitative studies, conference proceedings, letters, and editorials were excluded. The main conceptual categories were “author/year”, “study design”, “participant’s characteristics”, “walking conditions”, “instruments” and “outcomes”. Results: The search identified 827 potentially relevant studies, with a remaining seven fulfilling the established criteria. Interlimb coordination was assessed during walking in treadmill (n = 3), overground (n = 3) and both (n = 1). The instruments used monitored electromyography (n = 2), kinetics (n = 2), and kinematics (n = 4) to assess spatiotemporal parameters (n = 4), joint kinematics (n = 2), anteroposterior ground reaction forces (n = 2), and electromyography root mean square (n = 2) outcomes. These outcomes were mostly used to analyze symmetry indices or ratios, to calculate propulsive impulse and external mechanical power produced on the CoM, as well as antagonist coactivation. Conclusions: Assessment of interlimb coordination during gait is important for consideration of natural auto-selected overground walking, using kinematic, kinetic, and EMG instruments. These allow for the collection of the main biomechanical outcomes that could contribute to improve better knowledge of interlimb coordination assessment in poststroke patients.

Citing Articles

Repeatability and Temporal Consistency of Lower Limb Biomechanical Variables Expressing Interlimb Coordination during the Double-Support Phase in People with and without Stroke Sequelae.

Couto A, Vaz M, Pinho L, Felix J, Moreira J, Pinho F Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(5).

PMID: 36904730 PMC: 10007500. DOI: 10.3390/s23052526.

References
1.
Kuo A . Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. J Biomech Eng. 2002; 124(1):113-20. DOI: 10.1115/1.1427703. View

2.
Riley P, Paolini G, Croce U, Paylo K, Kerrigan D . A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture. 2006; 26(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003. View

3.
Reisman D, Wityk R, Silver K, Bastian A . Split-belt treadmill adaptation transfers to overground walking in persons poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23(7):735-44. PMC: 2811047. DOI: 10.1177/1545968309332880. View

4.
MacKay-Lyons M . Central pattern generation of locomotion: a review of the evidence. Phys Ther. 2002; 82(1):69-83. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/82.1.69. View

5.
Swinnen S, Carson R . The control and learning of patterns of interlimb coordination: past and present issues in normal and disordered control. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002; 110(2-3):129-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00030-6. View