» Articles » PMID: 35269747

Renal Oncocytoma: The Diagnostic Challenge to Unmask the Double of Renal Cancer

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35269747
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Renal oncocytoma represents the most common type of benign neoplasm that is an increasing concern for urologists, oncologists, and nephrologists due to its difficult differential diagnosis and frequent overtreatment. It displays a variable neoplastic parenchymal and stromal architecture, and the defining cellular element is a large polygonal, granular, eosinophilic, mitochondria-rich cell known as an oncocyte. The real challenge in the oncocytoma treatment algorithm is related to the misdiagnosis due to its resemblance, at an initial radiological assessment, to malignant renal cancers with a completely different prognosis and medical treatment. Unfortunately, percutaneous renal biopsy is not frequently performed due to the possible side effects related to the procedure. Therefore, the majority of oncocytoma are diagnosed after the surgical operation via partial or radical nephrectomy. For this reason, new reliable strategies to solve this issue are needed. In our review, we will discuss the clinical implications of renal oncocytoma in daily clinical practice with a particular focus on the medical diagnosis and treatment and on the potential of novel promising molecular biomarkers such as circulating microRNAs to distinguish between a benign and a malignant lesion.

Citing Articles

Renal Oncocytoma Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a Patient With Prior Pancoast Tumor.

Gould N, Brower B, Maree M, Dar A Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78150.

PMID: 40027059 PMC: 11870772. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78150.


Charting New Territory With a Novel WHO Provisional Category: A Case Study of a Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor (LOT) in the Kidney.

Alagar J, Firde K, Fentaw B, Amer S, Seth A, Proca D Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78132.

PMID: 40018496 PMC: 11867201. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78132.


Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics using multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

Ye Y, Weng B, Guo Y, Huang L, Xie S, Zhong G Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1501084.

PMID: 39975590 PMC: 11835681. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1501084.


Histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of adult renal tumors: a five-year retrospective study in Mureş County, Romania.

Loghin A, Raicea A, Popelea M, Todea-Moga C, Vida O, Borda A Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2024; 65(3):457-465.

PMID: 39529339 PMC: 11657323. DOI: 10.47162/RJME.65.3.08.


Multiparameter computed tomography (CT) radiomics signature fusion-based model for the preoperative prediction of clear cell renal cell carcinoma nuclear grade: a multicenter development and external validation study.

Xv Y, Wei Z, Lv F, Jiang Q, Guo H, Zheng Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(10):7031-7045.

PMID: 39429571 PMC: 11485359. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-35.


References
1.
Hauser S, Wulfken L, Holdenrieder S, Moritz R, Ohlmann C, Jung V . Analysis of serum microRNAs (miR-26a-2*, miR-191, miR-337-3p and miR-378) as potential biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012; 36(4):391-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.04.001. View

2.
Li X, Nie P, Zhang J, Hou F, Ma Q, Cui J . Differential diagnosis of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma using CT features: a central scar-matched retrospective study. Acta Radiol. 2021; 63(2):253-260. DOI: 10.1177/0284185120988109. View

3.
Delahunt B, Eble J, McCredie M, Bethwaite P, Stewart J, Bilous A . Morphologic typing of papillary renal cell carcinoma: comparison of growth kinetics and patient survival in 66 cases. Hum Pathol. 2001; 32(6):590-5. DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2001.24984. View

4.
Crotty T, Farrow G, Lieber M . Chromophobe cell renal carcinoma: clinicopathological features of 50 cases. J Urol. 1995; 154(3):964-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66944-1. View

5.
Wu Y, Du L, Li F, Zhang H, Cai Y, Jia X . Renal oncocytoma: contrast-enhanced sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med. 2013; 32(3):441-8. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2013.32.3.441. View