» Articles » PMID: 35268458

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C and Ahmed Valve Implantation with Mitomycin C in Eyes with Uveitic Glaucoma

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35268458
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compared 1-year outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) and Ahmed valve implantation with MMC as a first surgical procedure in patients with uveitic glaucoma. A total 38 eyes of 38 patients undergoing trabeculectomy ( =16) or Ahmed valve implantation ( = 22) were included. Surgical success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mmHg, IOP reduction ≥20% from baseline, no secondary glaucoma surgery, and no loss of light perception. The main outcome measurements including success rate, IOP, and the number of antiglaucoma medications and complications were compared. The overall success rates were comparable between the Ahmed and trabeculectomy groups (81.3 vs. 81.8%, = 0.987). The mean IOPs were similar as well ( = 0.084), though the number of antiglaucoma medications was significantly lower in the trabeculectomy group than in the Ahmed group (1.0 ± 1.2 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1; = 0.005). A statistically significant reduction in corneal endothelial cell density was noted in the Ahmed group ( = 0.004). Both treatments offered reasonable IOP control and safety for eyes with uveitic glaucoma. However, significantly fewer antiglaucoma medications were used in the trabeculectomy group. Furthermore, our results suggest that cautious postoperative monitoring with regard to corneal endothelial cell density should be additionally performed after Ahmed valve implantation.

Citing Articles

Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Uveitic Glaucoma.

Halkiadakis I, Konstantopoulou K, Tzimis V, Papadopoulos N, Chatzistefanou K, Markomichelakis N J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592059 PMC: 10931771. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051185.


Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss after Ciliary Sulcus Placement of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in Patients with Noninfectious Uveitic Glaucoma.

Komatsu K, Harada Y, Hiyama T, Sada I, Hirooka K, Kiuchi Y J Pers Med. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36556295 PMC: 9785813. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12122075.

References
1.
Sung V, Barton K . Management of inflammatory glaucomas. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15(2):136-40. DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200404000-00014. View

2.
Kee C . Prevention of early postoperative hypotony by partial ligation of silicone tube in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. J Glaucoma. 2001; 10(6):466-9. DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200112000-00005. View

3.
Kook M, Yoon J, Kim J, Lee M . Clinical results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory glaucoma with adjunctive mitomycin C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2000; 31(2):100-6. View

4.
Alvarado J, Hollander D, Juster R, Lee L . Ahmed valve implantation with adjunctive mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil: long-term outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146(2):276-284. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.008. View

5.
Bao N, Jiang Z, Coh P, Tao L . Long-term outcomes of uveitic glaucoma treated with Ahmed valve implant in a series of Chinese patients. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018; 11(4):629-634. PMC: 5902368. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.04.15. View