» Articles » PMID: 35268157

Influence of Maternal Protein Restriction in Primiparous Beef Heifers During Mid- And/or Late-Gestation on Progeny Feedlot Performance and Carcass Characteristics

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35268157
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study investigated the impacts of metabolizable protein (MP) restriction in primiparous heifers during mid- and/or late-gestation on progeny performance and carcass characteristics. Heifers were allocated to 12 pens in a randomized complete block design. The factorial treatment structure included two stages of gestation (mid- and late-) and two levels of dietary protein (control (CON); ~101% of MP requirements and restricted (RES); ~80% of MP requirements). Half of the pens on each treatment were randomly reassigned to the other treatment at the end of mid-gestation. Progeny were finished in a GrowSafe feeding system and carcass measurements were collected. Gestation treatment x time interactions indicated that MP restriction negatively influenced heifer body weight (BW), body condition score, and longissimus muscle (LM) area (p < 0.05), but not fat thickness (p > 0.05). Treatment did not affect the feeding period, initial or final BW, dry matter intake, or average daily gain of progeny (p > 0.05). The progeny of dams on the RES treatment in late gestation had a greater LM area (p = 0.04), but not when adjusted on a hot carcass weight basis (p > 0.10). Minimal differences in the animal performance and carcass characteristics suggest that the level of MP restriction imposed during mid- and late-gestation in this study did not have a significant developmental programming effect.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Muscle Long Non-Coding RNA Profile during Rearing and Finishing Phase of Bulls Subjected to Different Prenatal Nutritional Strategies.

Cracco R, Alexandre P, Polizel G, Fernandes A, Santana M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38396620 PMC: 10886332. DOI: 10.3390/ani14040652.


Impacts of Different Prenatal Supplementation Strategies on the Plasma Metabolome of Bulls in the Rearing and Finishing Phase.

Polizel G, Fernandes A, Furlan E, Prati B, Ferraz J, Santana M Metabolites. 2023; 13(2).

PMID: 36837878 PMC: 9960736. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13020259.


A review of the effect of nutrient and energy restriction during late gestation on beef cattle offspring growth and development.

Waldon N, Nickles K, Parker A, Swanson K, Relling A J Anim Sci. 2023; 101.

PMID: 36592744 PMC: 9831102. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac319.

References
1.
Greenwood P, Cafe L . Prenatal and pre-weaning growth and nutrition of cattle: long-term consequences for beef production. Animal. 2012; 1(9):1283-96. DOI: 10.1017/S175173110700050X. View

2.
Ford S, Hess B, Schwope M, Nijland M, Gilbert J, Vonnahme K . Maternal undernutrition during early to mid-gestation in the ewe results in altered growth, adiposity, and glucose tolerance in male offspring. J Anim Sci. 2007; 85(5):1285-94. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-624. View

3.
Wu G, Bazer F, Wallace J, Spencer T . Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences. J Anim Sci. 2006; 84(9):2316-37. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-156. View

4.
Zhu M, Ford S, Means W, Hess B, Nathanielsz P, Du M . Maternal nutrient restriction affects properties of skeletal muscle in offspring. J Physiol. 2006; 575(Pt 1):241-50. PMC: 1819430. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.112110. View

5.
Summers A, Blair A, Funston R . Impact of supplemental protein source offered to primiparous heifers during gestation on II. Progeny performance and carcass characteristics. J Anim Sci. 2015; 93(4):1871-80. PMC: 7110259. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8297. View