» Articles » PMID: 35266003

The GUIDE-HF Trial of Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitoring in Heart Failure: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Aims: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, important changes in heart failure (HF) event rates have been widely reported, but few data address potential causes for these changes; several possibilities were examined in the GUIDE-HF study.

Methods And Results: From 15 March 2018 to 20 December 2019, patients were randomized to haemodynamic-guided management (treatment) vs. control for 12 months, with a primary endpoint of all-cause mortality plus HF events. Pre-COVID-19, the primary endpoint rate was 0.553 vs. 0.682 events/patient-year in the treatment vs. control group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, P = 0.049]. Treatment difference was no longer evident during COVID-19 (HR 1.11, P = 0.526), with a 21% decrease in the control group (0.536 events/patient-year) and no change in the treatment group (0.597 events/patient-year). Data reflecting provider-, disease-, and patient-dependent factors that might change the primary endpoint rate during COVID-19 were examined. Subject contact frequency was similar in the treatment vs. control group before and during COVID-19. During COVID-19, the monthly rate of medication changes fell 19.2% in the treatment vs. 10.7% in the control group to levels not different between groups (P = 0.362). COVID-19 was infrequent and not different between groups. Pulmonary artery pressure area under the curve decreased -98 mmHg-days in the treatment group vs. -100 mmHg-days in the controls (P = 0.867). Patient compliance with the study protocol was maintained during COVID-19 in both groups.

Conclusion: During COVID-19, the primary event rate decreased in the controls and remained low in the treatment group, resulting in an effacement of group differences that were present pre-COVID-19. These outcomes did not result from changes in provider- or disease-dependent factors; pulmonary artery pressure decreased despite fewer medication changes, suggesting that patient-dependent factors played an important role in these outcomes. Clinical Trials.gov: NCT03387813.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of colchicine and spironolactone after myocardial infarction: the CLEAR-SYNERGY trial in perspective.

Tardif J, Kouz S Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024; 13(12):843-844.

PMID: 39569611 PMC: 11666306. DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae135.


Indications for renal denervation in the treatment of hypertension.

Katsurada K, Kario K Hypertens Res. 2024; 47(10):2693-2699.

PMID: 39112539 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01823-3.


Effectiveness of remote pulmonary artery pressure estimating in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Urban S, Szymanski O, Grzesiak M, Tokarczyk W, Blaziak M, Jura M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12929.

PMID: 38839890 PMC: 11153505. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63742-0.


The favourable alliance between CardioMEMS and levosimendan in patients with advanced heart failure.

Visco V, Esposito C, Rispoli A, Di Pietro P, Izzo C, Loria F ESC Heart Fail. 2024; 11(5):2835-2848.

PMID: 38761030 PMC: 11424304. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14838.


Rethinking heart failure clinical trials: the heart failure collaboratory.

Alkalbani M, Psotka M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1350569.

PMID: 38327488 PMC: 10847294. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1350569.