» Articles » PMID: 35265623

The Dynamic Instability of the Aneuploid Genome

Overview
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35265623
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Proper partitioning of replicated sister chromatids at each mitosis is crucial for maintaining cell homeostasis. Errors in this process lead to aneuploidy, a condition in which daughter cells harbor genome imbalances. Importantly, aneuploid cells often experience DNA damage, which in turn could drive genome instability. This might be the product of DNA damage accumulation in micronuclei and/or a consequence of aneuploidy-induced replication stress in S-phase. Although high levels of genome instability are associated with cell cycle arrest, they can also confer a proliferative advantage in some circumstances and fuel tumor growth. Here, we review the main consequences of chromosome segregation errors on genome stability, with a special focus on the bidirectional relationship between aneuploidy and DNA damage. Also, we discuss recent findings showing how increased genome instability can provide a proliferation improvement under specific conditions, including chemotherapeutic treatments.

Citing Articles

Human aneuploid cells depend on the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway for overcoming increased DNA damage.

Zerbib J, Ippolito M, Eliezer Y, De Feudis G, Reuveni E, Savir Kadmon A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7772.

PMID: 39251587 PMC: 11385192. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52176-x.


Pediatric Tumors as Disorders of Development: The Case for In Vitro Modeling Based on Human Stem Cells.

Clairmont C, Gell J, Lau C Cancer Control. 2024; 31:10732748241270564.

PMID: 39118322 PMC: 11311176. DOI: 10.1177/10732748241270564.


The TP53-activated E3 ligase RNF144B is a tumour suppressor that prevents genomic instability.

Abad E, Sandoz J, Romero G, Zadra I, Urgel-Solas J, Borredat P J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43(1):127.

PMID: 38685100 PMC: 11057071. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-03045-4.


Control of cell proliferation by memories of mitosis.

Meitinger F, Belal H, Davis R, Martinez M, Shiau A, Oegema K Science. 2024; 383(6690):1441-1448.

PMID: 38547292 PMC: 11621110. DOI: 10.1126/science.add9528.


Two decades of chromosomal instability and aneuploidy.

Santaguida S Chromosome Res. 2024; 32(1):4.

PMID: 38416208 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-024-09748-w.


References
1.
Santaguida S, Amon A . Short- and long-term effects of chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015; 16(8):473-85. DOI: 10.1038/nrm4025. View

2.
Duncan A, Hanlon Newell A, Smith L, Wilson E, Olson S, Thayer M . Frequent aneuploidy among normal human hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2011; 142(1):25-8. PMC: 3244538. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.029. View

3.
Ly P, Brunner S, Shoshani O, Kim D, Lan W, Pyntikova T . Chromosome segregation errors generate a diverse spectrum of simple and complex genomic rearrangements. Nat Genet. 2019; 51(4):705-715. PMC: 6441390. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0360-8. View

4.
Pavelka N, Rancati G, Zhu J, Bradford W, Saraf A, Florens L . Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature. 2010; 468(7321):321-5. PMC: 2978756. DOI: 10.1038/nature09529. View

5.
Dephoure N, Hwang S, OSullivan C, Dodgson S, Gygi S, Amon A . Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. Elife. 2014; 3:e03023. PMC: 4129440. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.03023. View