» Articles » PMID: 35265564

Inadequate Bioavailability of Intramuscular Epinephrine in a Neonatal Asphyxia Model

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35265564
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over half a million newborn deaths are attributed to intrapartum related events annually, the majority of which occur in low resource settings. While progress has been made in reducing the burden of asphyxia, novel approaches may need to be considered to further decrease rates of newborn mortality. Administration of intravenous, intraosseous or endotracheal epinephrine is recommended by the Newborn Resuscitation Program (NRP) with sustained bradycardia at birth. However, delivery by these routes requires both advanced skills and specialized equipment. Intramuscular (IM) epinephrine may represent a simple, low cost and highly accessible alternative for consideration in the care of infants compromised at birth. At present, the bioavailability of IM epinephrine in asphyxia remains unclear.

Methods: Four term fetal lambs were delivered by cesarean section and asphyxiated by umbilical cord occlusion with resuscitation after 5 min of asystole. IM epinephrine (0.1 mg/kg) was administered intradeltoid after 1 min of positive pressure ventilation with 30 s of chest compressions. Serial blood samples were obtained for determination of plasma epinephrine concentrations by ELISA.

Results: Epinephrine concentrations failed to increase following administration IM injection. Delayed absorption was observed after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in half of the studies.

Conclusions: Inadequate absorption of epinephrine occurs with IM administration during asphyxial cardiac arrest, implying this route would be ineffective in infants who are severely compromised at birth. Late absorption following ROSC raises concerns for risks of side effects. However, the bioavailability and efficacy of intramuscular epinephrine in less profound asphyxia may warrant further evaluation.

Citing Articles

Intramuscular versus intravenous epinephrine administration in a pediatric porcine model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OReilly M, Tijssen J, Lee T, Ramsie M, Cheung P, Schmolzer G Resusc Plus. 2024; 20:100769.

PMID: 39309745 PMC: 11415816. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100769.


Femoral Occlusion during Neonatal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Outcomes in an Ovine Model of Perinatal Cardiac Arrest.

Rawat M, Mani S, Gugino S, Koenigsknecht C, Helman J, Nielsen L Children (Basel). 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 38002895 PMC: 10670492. DOI: 10.3390/children10111804.

References
1.
Vali P, Weiner G, Sankaran D, Lakshminrusimha S . What is the optimal initial dose of epinephrine during neonatal resuscitation in the delivery room?. J Perinatol. 2021; 41(7):1769-1773. PMC: 11864038. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01032-7. View

2.
Sobotka K, Polglase G, Schmolzer G, Davis P, Klingenberg C, Hooper S . Effects of chest compressions on cardiovascular and cerebral hemodynamics in asphyxiated near-term lambs. Pediatr Res. 2015; 78(4):395-400. DOI: 10.1038/pr.2015.117. View

3.
Singhal N, Bhutta Z . Newborn resuscitation in resource-limited settings. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008; 13(6):432-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2008.04.013. View

4.
Kinney M, Cocoman O, Dickson K, Daelmans B, Zaka N, Rhoda N . Implementation of the Every Newborn Action Plan: Progress and lessons learned. Semin Perinatol. 2015; 39(5):326-37. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.06.004. View

5.
Versantvoort J, Kleinhout M, Ockhuijsen H, Bloemenkamp K, de Vries W, van den Hoogen A . Helping Babies Breathe and its effects on intrapartum-related stillbirths and neonatal mortality in low-resource settings: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2019; 105(2):127-133. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316319. View