» Articles » PMID: 35264924

Musicality and Age Interaction in Tone Development

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2022 Mar 10
PMID 35264924
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vocal pitch, which involves not only F0 but also multiple covarying acoustic cues is central to linguistic perception and production at various levels of prosodic structure. Recent studies on language development have shown that differences in learners' musicality affect the F0 cue development in perception of sentence-level intonation or in prosodic realization of focus. This study aims to contribute toward a fuller understanding of the effect of musicality on linguistic pitch development via a close investigation of the relationship between musicality, age, and lexical tone production covering both F0 and spectral cues in children. Forty-three native Mandarin-speaking children between the ages of 4 and 6 years are recruited to participate in both a semi-spontaneous tone production task and a musicality test. For each age (4, 5, and 6 years) and musicality (below or above the median score of each age group) group, the contrastivity of the four tones is evaluated by performing automatic tone classification using three sets of acoustic cues (F0, spectral cues, and both). It has been found that higher musicality is associated with higher contrastivity of the tones produced at the age of 4 and 5 years, but not at the age of 6 years. These results suggest that musicality promotes earlier development of tone production only in earlier stages of prosodic development; by the age of 6 years, the musicality advantage in tone production subsides.

Citing Articles

Perception and Production of Pitch Information in Mandarin-Speaking Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Ma W, Dai X, Zhang H J Autism Dev Disord. 2024; .

PMID: 39556298 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-024-06601-1.


The Sequence Recall Task and Lexicality of Tone: Exploring Tone "Deafness".

Gussenhoven C, Lu Y, Lee-Kim S, Liu C, Rahmani H, Riad T Front Psychol. 2022; 13:902569.

PMID: 35910979 PMC: 9326472. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902569.

References
1.
KALMUS H, FRY D . On tune deafness (dysmelodia): frequency, development, genetics and musical background. Ann Hum Genet. 1980; 43(4):369-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1980.tb01571.x. View

2.
Zhang C, Shao J, Huang X . Deficits of congenital amusia beyond pitch: Evidence from impaired categorical perception of vowels in Cantonese-speaking congenital amusics. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0183151. PMC: 5568739. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183151. View

3.
Wong P, Schwartz R, Jenkins J . Perception and production of lexical tones by 3-year-old, Mandarin-speaking children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 48(5):1065-79. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/074). View

4.
Moreno S, Marques C, Santos A, Santos M, Castro S, Besson M . Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: more evidence for brain plasticity. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 19(3):712-23. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn120. View

5.
Ho Y, Cheung M, Chan A . Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations in children. Neuropsychology. 2003; 17(3):439-50. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.3.439. View