» Articles » PMID: 35262840

Forearm and Hand Muscles Exhibit High Coactivation and Overlapping of Cortical Motor Representations

Overview
Journal Brain Topogr
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Mar 9
PMID 35262840
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most of the motor mapping procedures using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) follow the conventional somatotopic organization of the primary motor cortex (M1) by assessing the representation of a particular target muscle, disregarding the possible coactivation of synergistic muscles. In turn, multiple reports describe a functional organization of the M1 with an overlapping among motor representations acting together to execute movements. In this context, the overlap degree among cortical representations of synergistic hand and forearm muscles remains an open question. This study aimed to evaluate the muscle coactivation and representation overlapping common to the grasping movement and its dependence on the stimulation parameters. The nTMS motor maps were obtained from one carpal muscle and two intrinsic hand muscles during rest. We quantified the overlapping motor maps in size (area and volume overlap degree) and topography (similarity and centroid Euclidean distance) parameters. We demonstrated that these muscle representations are highly overlapped and similar in shape. The overlap degrees involving the forearm muscle were significantly higher than only among the intrinsic hand muscles. Moreover, the stimulation intensity had a stronger effect on the size compared to the topography parameters. Our study contributes to a more detailed cortical motor representation towards a synergistic, functional arrangement of M1. Understanding the muscle group coactivation may provide more accurate motor maps when delineating the eloquent brain tissue during pre-surgical planning.

Citing Articles

Muscle synergies for multidirectional isometric force generation during maintenance of upright standing posture.

Monte A, Benamati A, Pavan A, dAvella A, Bertucco M Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(8):1881-1902.

PMID: 38874594 PMC: 11252224. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06866-z.


A robot-aided visuomotor wrist training induces motor and proprioceptive learning that transfers to the untrained ipsilateral elbow.

Zhu H, Wang Y, Elangovan N, Cappello L, Sandini G, Masia L J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):143.

PMID: 37875916 PMC: 10594917. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01258-w.


MarLe: Markerless estimation of head pose for navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Matsuda R, Souza V, Kirsten P, Ilmoniemi R, Baffa O Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023; 46(2):887-896.

PMID: 37166586 PMC: 10209239. DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01263-2.


Accounting for Stimulations That Do Not Elicit Motor-Evoked Potentials When Mapping Cortical Representations of Multiple Muscles.

Jin F, Bruijn S, Daffertshofer A Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:920538.

PMID: 35814946 PMC: 9263445. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.920538.

References
1.
Wilson S, Thickbroom G, Mastaglia F . Transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping of the motor cortex in normal subjects. The representation of two intrinsic hand muscles. J Neurol Sci. 1993; 118(2):134-44. DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90102-5. View

2.
Frey D, Schilt S, Strack V, Zdunczyk A, Rosler J, Niraula B . Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation improves the treatment outcome in patients with brain tumors in motor eloquent locations. Neuro Oncol. 2014; 16(10):1365-72. PMC: 4165423. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou110. View

3.
Overduin S, dAvella A, Carmena J, Bizzi E . Microstimulation activates a handful of muscle synergies. Neuron. 2012; 76(6):1071-7. PMC: 3547640. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.018. View

4.
Latash M, Scholz J, Schoner G . Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control. 2007; 11(3):276-308. DOI: 10.1123/mcj.11.3.276. View

5.
Cavaleri R, Schabrun S, Chipchase L . The reliability and validity of rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping. Brain Stimul. 2018; 11(6):1291-1295. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.07.043. View