» Articles » PMID: 35262554

Ultrasound Device As a Minimally Invasive Approach for Caries Dentin Removal

Overview
Journal Braz Dent J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Mar 9
PMID 35262554
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an ultrasound device and the dentin surface morphology after removal of the caries dentin lesions by removal rate and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The Knoop hardness test on the bovine dentin blocks (n = 20, 4x4x2mm) was performed to standardize the samples and only those with 38 ± 2 KHN were included. The dentin blocks were submitted to induction of artificial caries lesions, using the bacterial model. Strains of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus were used for 7 days. The caries dentin lesion was removed for 1 min, according to two methods: G1 - carbide bur under low-speed rotation (control group) and G2 - ultrasound device under refrigeration. For the removal rate, the samples were weighed 3 times: T0 (before induction), T1 (after induction) and T2 (after removal). Morphology evaluation of the residual dentin surface was performed by SEM. Data normality was verified by Shapiro-Wilk test (p ≥ 0.240). T-test for independent samples was applied to evaluate the removal rate. A significance level of 5% was adopted. G2 provided lower removal rate than G1 (G1: 3.68 mg and G2 = 2.26 mg). SEM images showed different morphological characteristics between the groups. G2 showed absent of smear layer, while G1 showed a visible smear layer over the surface. We concluded that ultrasound device provides minimally invasive removal with residual dentin exhibiting open dentin tubules and no smear layer formation and no bacteria, which infer the removal of the infected tissue.

Citing Articles

Using Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy with Ultrasound Devices and Bioactive Glasses as a Combined Approach for Treating Dentin Caries Lesions.

Besegato J, de Melo P, Abreu Bernardi A, Souza M, Zanotto E, Bagnato V Pathogens. 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37624012 PMC: 10459246. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12081052.


Micro-CT analysis and leakage of bioceramic retrofillings after ultrasonic and Er:YAG laser cavity preparations: an in vitro study.

Markovic L, Ivanisevic A, Matijevic J, Chan R, Tsoi J, Snjaric D Lasers Med Sci. 2023; 38(1):145.

PMID: 37347307 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03809-y.


Enhanced Clinical Decision-Making and Delivery of Minimally Invasive Care Using the ICCMS4D Integrated with Hands-Free Fluorescence-Based Loupes and a Chemomechanical Caries Removal Agent.

Hiltch G, Steier L, de Figueiredo J Eur J Dent. 2023; 17(4):1356-1362.

PMID: 37105220 PMC: 10756833. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1764423.

References
1.
Ntovas P, Doukoudakis S, Tzoutzas J, Lagouvardos P . Evidence provided for the use of oscillating instruments in restorative dentistry: A systematic review. Eur J Dent. 2017; 11(2):268-273. PMC: 5502578. DOI: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_232_16. View

2.
Lea S, Landini G, Walmsley A . Vibration characteristics of ultrasonic scalers assessed with scanning laser vibrometry. J Dent. 2002; 30(4):147-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00009-x. View

3.
Banerjee A, Kidd E, Watson T . In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res. 2000; 34(2):144-50. DOI: 10.1159/000016582. View

4.
FUSAYAMA T, Okuse K, Hosoda H . Relationship between hardness, discoloration, and microbial invasion in carious dentin. J Dent Res. 1966; 45(4):1033-46. DOI: 10.1177/00220345660450040401. View

5.
Bowen W, Burne R, Wu H, Koo H . Oral Biofilms: Pathogens, Matrix, and Polymicrobial Interactions in Microenvironments. Trends Microbiol. 2017; 26(3):229-242. PMC: 5834367. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.008. View