» Articles » PMID: 35255833

The Fiber Diameter Traits of Tibetan Cashmere Goats Are Governed by the Inherent Differences in Stress, Hypoxic, and Metabolic Adaptations: an Integrative Study of Proteome and Transcriptome

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2022 Mar 8
PMID 35255833
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tibetan cashmere goats are served as a valuable model for high altitude adaptation and hypoxia complications related studies, while the cashmere produced by these goats is an important source of income for the herders. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in protein abundance underlying the fine (average 12.20 ± 0.03 μm of mean fiber diameter) and coarse cashmere (average 14.67 ± 0.05 μm of mean fiber diameter) producing by Tibetan cashmere goats. We systematically investigated the genetic determinants of fiber diameter by integrated analysis with proteomic and transcriptomic datasets from skin tissues of Tibetan cashmere goats.

Results: We identified 1980 proteins using a label-free proteomics approach. They were annotated to three different databases, while 1730 proteins were mapped to the original protein coding genes (PCGs) of the transcriptomic study. Comparative analyses of cashmere with extremely fine vs. coarse phenotypes yielded 29 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs), for instance, APOH, GANAB, AEBP1, CP, CPB2, GPR142, VTN, IMPA1, CTSZ, GLB1, and HMCN1. Functional enrichment analysis of these DEPs revealed their involvement in oxidation-reduction process, cell redox homeostasis, metabolic, PI3K-Akt, MAPK, and Wnt signaling pathways. Transcription factors enrichment analysis revealed the proteins mainly belong to NF-YB family, HMG family, CSD family. We further validated the protein abundance of four DEPs (GC, VTN, AEBP1, and GPR142) through western blot, and considered they were the most potential candidate genes for cashmere traits in Tibetan cashmere goats.

Conclusions: These analyses indicated that the major biological variations underlying the difference of cashmere fiber diameter in Tibetan cashmere goats were attributed to the inherent adaptations related to metabolic, hypoxic, and stress response differences. This study provided novel insights into the breeding strategies for cashmere traits and enhance the understanding of the biological and genetic mechanisms of cashmere traits in Tibetan cashmere goats.

Citing Articles

Molecular insights into Pashmina fiber production: comparative skin transcriptomic analysis of Changthangi goats and sheep.

Ahlawat S, Vasu M, Mir M, Singh M, Arora R, Sharma R Mamm Genome. 2024; 35(2):160-169.

PMID: 38589518 DOI: 10.1007/s00335-024-10040-9.


Integration Analysis of Hair Follicle Transcriptome and Proteome Reveals the Mechanisms Regulating Wool Fiber Diameter in Angora Rabbits.

Huang D, Ding H, Wang Y, Wang X, Zhao H Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(6).

PMID: 38542234 PMC: 10970426. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25063260.


Proteome Analysis of Alpine Merino Sheep Skin Reveals New Insights into the Mechanisms Involved in Regulating Wool Fiber Diameter.

Yue L, Lu Z, Guo T, Liu J, Yang B, Yuan C Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(20).

PMID: 37894908 PMC: 10607505. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242015227.


Hair Follicle Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Differentially Expressed Genes That Regulate Wool Fiber Diameter in Angora Rabbits.

Huang D, Ding H, Wang Y, Cheng G, Wang X, Leng T Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36979137 PMC: 10045444. DOI: 10.3390/biology12030445.


Combined Transcriptomic and Proteomic of Infection in the Spleen of Dairy Goats.

Fu M, Xu X, Cheng Z, Zhu J, Sun A, Xu G Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(23).

PMID: 36496794 PMC: 9736189. DOI: 10.3390/ani12233270.


References
1.
Buccitelli C, Selbach M . mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control. Nat Rev Genet. 2020; 21(10):630-644. DOI: 10.1038/s41576-020-0258-4. View

2.
Akilli Ozturk O, Pakula H, Chmielowiec J, Qi J, Stein S, Lan L . Gab1 and Mapk Signaling Are Essential in the Hair Cycle and Hair Follicle Stem Cell Quiescence. Cell Rep. 2015; 13(3):561-572. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.015. View

3.
Ghazalpour A, Bennett B, Petyuk V, Orozco L, Hagopian R, Mungrue I . Comparative analysis of proteome and transcriptome variation in mouse. PLoS Genet. 2011; 7(6):e1001393. PMC: 3111477. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001393. View

4.
Park H, Kim J, Sun B, Song S, Suh W, Sung J . Hypoxia induces glucose uptake and metabolism of adipose‑derived stem cells. Mol Med Rep. 2016; 14(5):4706-4714. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5796. View

5.
Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, Thorvaldsdottir H, Tamayo P, Mesirov J . Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(12):1739-40. PMC: 3106198. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260. View