» Articles » PMID: 35245879

A Randomised Double-blind Controlled Study of Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia in STN or GPi - A Long Term Follow-up After Up to 15 Years

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2022 Mar 4
PMID 35245879
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: This is a long-term open follow-up of a prospective double-blind crossover study, where electrodes were bilaterally implanted in both the Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal pallidum (GPi) in patients with isolated dystonia.

Methods: Patients with isolated dystonia were included to undergo surgery with Deep Brain stimulation (DBS) and after randomization, in a double-blind cross-over study, receiving bilateral stimulation of either STN or GPi for 6 months in each target. Preoperative and postoperative assessments with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were performed. In this long-term follow-up (LFU), these ratings were repeated, and patients were evaluated with cognitive tests.

Results: 21 patients were included in the protocol, 9 patients with generalized dystonia, 12 with a diagnosis of cervical dystonia. The mean duration of disease was 19.3 years, age at time of surgery 50.1 years. Fourteen patients participated in the LFU. At a mean follow-up of 10.2 years (range 4.8-15.4), BFMDRS movement score was improved with a mean of 36% (p < 0.05) compared with baseline. At LFU both a statistically significant improvement of stimulation in STN on BFMDRS movement score (p = 0.029) and Gpi (p = 0.008) was demonstrated, no significant difference was found between the two targets (p = 0.076). SF-36 improved for both targets.

Conclusion: In this study we performed a long-term follow-up in 14 patients with cervical or generalized dystonia, who received stimulation in GPi, STN or both. The mean follow-up time was more than 10 years. Our data support a long-term effect of both STN-DBS and GPi-DBS in dystonia with equal effect and safety for up to 15 years. STN has been proven a viable safe and effective target and may be used as an alternative to GPi in both adult-onset cervical dystonia and generalized dystonia.

Citing Articles

Sustained quality-of-life improvements over 10 years after subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for isolated dystonia.

Zhang S, Li Y, Chen D, Li H, Wang T, Huang P J Neurol. 2025; 272(1):92.

PMID: 39776258 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12820-4.


Engaging dystonia networks with subthalamic stimulation.

Butenko K, Neudorfer C, Dembek T, Hollunder B, Meyer G, Li N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(2):e2417617122.

PMID: 39773021 PMC: 11745339. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2417617122.


Comparison of different surgical strategies for cervical dystonia: Evidence from Bayesian network analysis.

Qiu Y, Xue T, Bai Y, Han C, Xie M, Teng H Eur J Neurol. 2024; 32(1):e16527.

PMID: 39535380 PMC: 11622514. DOI: 10.1111/ene.16527.


Real-world outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation for dystonia treatment: Protocol for a prospective, multicenter, international registry.

Albanese A, Jain R, Krauss J PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0303381.

PMID: 39331655 PMC: 11432838. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303381.


Pallidal Versus Subthalamic Deep-Brain Stimulation for Generalized Isolated Dystonia: A Retrospective Study.

Wu J, Zhu G, Gan Y, Meng F, Yang A, Zhang J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39201044 PMC: 11355894. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164902.