» Articles » PMID: 35243434

Dose-limiting, Adverse Event-associated Bradycardia with β-blocker Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in the GENETIC-AF Trial

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often have conduction system disorders, which may be worsened by β-blocker therapy.

Objective: In a post hoc analysis we examined the prevalence of bradycardia and its association with adverse events (AEs) and failure to achieve target dose in the GENETIC-AF trial.

Methods: Patients randomized to metoprolol (n = 125) or bucindolol (n = 131) entering 24-week efficacy follow-up and receiving study medication were evaluated. Bradycardia was defined as an electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate (HR) <60 beats per minute (bpm) and severe bradycardia <50 bpm.

Results: Mean HR in sinus rhythm (SR) was 62.6 ± 12.5 bpm for metoprolol and 68.3 ± 11.1 bpm for bucindolol ( < .0001), but in AF HRs were not different (87.5 bpm vs 89.7 bpm, respectively). Episodes per patient for bucindolol vs metoprolol were 0.82 vs 2.08 ( < .001) for bradycardia and 0.24 vs 0.57 for severe bradycardia ( < .001), with 98.9% of the episodes occurring in SR. Patients experiencing bradycardia had a 4.15-fold higher prevalence of study medication dose reduction ( <.0001) compared to patients without bradycardia. Fewer patients receiving metoprolol were at target dose (61.7% vs 74.9% for bucindolol, < .0001) at ECG recordings, and bradycardia AEs were more prevalent in the metoprolol group (13 vs 1 for bucindolol, = .001). On multivariate analysis of 21 candidate bradycardia predictors including presence of a device with pacing capability, bucindolol treatment was associated with the greatest degree of prevention (Z -4.24, < .0001).

Conclusion: In AF-prone HF patients bradycardia may limit the effectiveness of β blockers, and this property is agent-dependent.

Citing Articles

Sessions of acupuncture and nutritional therapy evaluation for atrial fibrillation (Santé-AF): a randomised feasibility study.

Charlesworth K, Torgerson D, Watson J Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025; 11(1):21.

PMID: 40001242 PMC: 11854018. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-025-01604-w.

References
1.
Jackson 2nd L, Rathakrishnan B, Campbell K, Thomas K, Piccini J, Bahnson T . Sinus Node Dysfunction and Atrial Fibrillation: A Reversible Phenomenon?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017; 40(4):442-450. DOI: 10.1111/pace.13030. View

2.
Kao D, Davis G, Aleong R, OConnor C, Fiuzat M, Carson P . Effect of bucindolol on heart failure outcomes and heart rate response in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012; 15(3):324-33. PMC: 3576901. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs181. View

3.
Kotecha D, Piccini J . Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: what should we do?. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(46):3250-7. PMC: 4670966. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv513. View

4.
Bristow M, Gilbert E, Abraham W, Adams K, Fowler M, Hershberger R . Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. MOCHA Investigators. Circulation. 1996; 94(11):2807-16. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.11.2807. View

5.
Barrett T, Abraham R, Jenkins C, Russ S, Storrow A, Darbar D . Risk factors for bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110(9):1315-21. PMC: 3470776. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.037. View