» Articles » PMID: 35243135

Conjunctival Erosion Following a PRESERFLO® MicroShunt Procedure

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 Mar 4
PMID 35243135
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We describe a case of conjunctival erosion following a PRESERFLO® MicroShunt procedure, and the subsequent revision surgery.

Observations: Conjunctival erosion was noted overlying the MicroShunt implant at postoperative week 11, 8 weeks following a bleb needling procedure for bleb encapsulation. A brisk leak was observed at the site of erosion. The patient underwent a subsequent revision procedure with repositioning of the MicroShunt implant and mitomycin C (MMC) application.

Conclusion And Importance: Conjunctival erosion may be a relatively rare but important complication following MicroShunt surgery and may arise from a variety of risk factors. Extra care should be taken during bleb needling in the context of MicroShunt, and needling should be directed posteriorly, beyond the distal tip of the MicroShunt.

Citing Articles

Five-year follow-up with the PreserFlo MicroShunt for open-angle glaucoma.

Scheres L, Kujovic-Aleksov S, Winkens B, de Crom R, Webers C, Beckers H Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39979610 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03707-3.


Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) 3D Observation of PreserFlo MicroShunt.

Tanito M, Omura T, Iida M, Murakami K, Ida C, Otani H Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72511.

PMID: 39606503 PMC: 11600234. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72511.


Conjunctival Advancement Procedure for Repairing Conjunctival Exposure of the PreserFlo MicroShunt.

Tanito M, Iida M, Murakami K, Ida C, Otani H, Takagi K Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72409.

PMID: 39588411 PMC: 11586878. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72409.


Scleral bridging technique for preventing PreserFlo microshunt exposure: A case report.

Nakakura S, Nagata Y, Fujisawa Y, Kiuchi Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(27):e38847.

PMID: 38968453 PMC: 11224877. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038847.


Dislocation of the PreserFlo MicroShunt During a Postsurgical Needling Procedure.

Murakami K, Iida M, Shimada A, Ichioka S, Harano A, Tsutsui A Cureus. 2023; 15(10):e47356.

PMID: 38022219 PMC: 10659566. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47356.


References
1.
Widder R, Dietlein T, Dinslage S, Kuhnrich P, Rennings C, Rossler G . The XEN45 Gel Stent as a minimally invasive procedure in glaucoma surgery: success rates, risk profile, and rates of re-surgery after 261 surgeries. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018; 256(4):765-771. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-018-3899-7. View

2.
Gedde S, Feuer W, Lim K, Barton K, Goyal S, Ahmed I . Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 3 Years of Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2019; 127(3):333-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.002. View

3.
Reitsamer H, Sng C, Vera V, Lenzhofer M, Barton K, Stalmans I . Two-year results of a multicenter study of the ab interno gelatin implant in medically uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019; 257(5):983-996. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04251-z. View

4.
Heidinger A, Schwab C, Lindner E, Riedl R, Mossbock G . A Retrospective Study of 199 Xen45 Stent Implantations From 2014 to 2016. J Glaucoma. 2018; 28(1):75-79. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001122. View

5.
Pakravan M, Yazdani S, Shahabi C, Yaseri M . Superior versus inferior Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Ophthalmology. 2008; 116(2):208-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.003. View