Loading Characteristics Data Applied on Osseointegrated Implant by Transfemoral Bone-anchored Prostheses Fitted with State-of-the-art Components During Daily Activities

Overview

Journal Data Brief

Date 2022 Mar 4

PMID 35242918

Authors

Laurent Frossard

Stefan Laux

Marta Geada

Peter Paul Heym

Knut Lechler

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The data in this paper are related to the research article entitled "Load applied on osseointegrated implant by transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses fitted with state-of-the-art prosthetic components" (Frossard et al. Clinical Biomechanics, 89 (2021) 105457. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105457). This article contains the overall and individual loading characteristics applied on transfemoral press-fit osseointegrated implant generated by bone-anchored prostheses fitted with state-of-the-art components during daily activities (i.e., microprocessor-controlled Rheo Knee XC knee, energy-storing-and-returning Pro-Flex XC or LP feet (ÖSSUR, Iceland)). Confounders of the loads are presented. The load profiles are characterized by the loading patterns, loading boundaries and loading local extrema of the forces and moments applied during straight-level walking, ascending and descending ramp and stairs at self-selected comfortable pace. The confounders of the loading information as well as new insights into inter-participants variability of loading patterns, loading boundaries and loading local extrema can inform the design of subsequent cross-sectional and longitudinal studies as well as literature reviews and meta-analyzes. The loading datasets are critical to clinicians and engineers designing finite element models of osseointegrated implants (e.g., medullar and percutaneous parts) and prosthetic components, algorithms capable to recognize the loading patterns applied on a residuum during daily activities, as well as clinical trials assessing the effects of particular prosthetic care interventions. Altogether, these datasets provide promoters of prosthetic care innovations with valuable insights informing the prescription of advanced prosthetic components to the growing population of individuals suffering from lower limb loss choosing bionics solutions. Online repository contains the files: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/gmsyv97cpc/1.

References

Frossard L, Laux S, Geada M, Heym P, Lechler K . Load applied on osseointegrated implant by transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses fitted with state-of-the-art prosthetic components. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021; 89:105457. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105457. View

Frossard L . Loading characteristics data applied on osseointegrated implant by transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses fitted with basic components during daily activities. Data Brief. 2019; 26:104492. PMC: 6811875. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104492. View

Frossard L . A Preliminary Cost-Utility Analysis of the Prosthetic Care Innovations: Basic Framework. Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2023; 4(2):36365. PMC: 10443481. DOI: 10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36365. View

Lee W, Frossard L, Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Branemark R, Evans J . Kinetics of transfemoral amputees with osseointegrated fixation performing common activities of daily living. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007; 22(6):665-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.02.005. View

Chadwell A, Diment L, Mico-Amigo M, Morgado Ramirez D, Dickinson A, Granat M . Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):93. PMC: 7362458. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00711-4. View

Guirao L, Samitier C, Costea M, Camos J, Majo M, Pleguezuelos E . Improvement in walking abilities in transfemoral amputees with a distal weight bearing implant. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016; 41(1):26-32. DOI: 10.1177/0309364616633920. View

Niswander W, Wang W, Baumann A . Characterizing loads at transfemoral osseointegrated implants. Med Eng Phys. 2020; 84:103-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.08.005. View

Fiedler G, Slavens B, Smith R, Briggs D, Hafner B . Criterion and construct validity of prosthesis-integrated measurement of joint moment data in persons with transtibial amputation. J Appl Biomech. 2014; 30(3):431-8. PMC: 4155026. DOI: 10.1123/jab.2013-0309. View

Frossard L, Leech B, Pitkin M . Loading applied on osseointegrated implant by transtibial bone-anchored prostheses during daily activities: Preliminary characterization of prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot. 2020; 32(4):258-271. PMC: 7526518. DOI: 10.1097/jpo.0000000000000280. View

10.

Frossard L, Haggstrom E, Hagberg K, Branemark R . Load applied on bone-anchored transfemoral prosthesis: characterization of a prosthesis-a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013; 50(5):619-34. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2012.04.0062. View

11.

Atallah R, Leijendekkers R, Hoogeboom T, Frolke J . Complications of bone-anchored prostheses for individuals with an extremity amputation: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8):e0201821. PMC: 6084937. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201821. View

12.

Frossard L, Merlo G, Burkett B, Quincey T, Berg D . Cost-effectiveness of bone-anchored prostheses using osseointegrated fixation: Myth or reality?. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017; 42(3):318-327. DOI: 10.1177/0309364617740239. View

13.

Prochor P, Frossard L, Sajewicz E . Effect of the material's stiffness on stress-shielding in osseointegrated implants for bone-anchored prostheses: a numerical analysis and initial benchmark data. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2020; 22(2):69-81. View

14.

Lee W, Frossard L, Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Gow D, Gray S . Magnitude and variability of loading on the osseointegrated implant of transfemoral amputees during walking. Med Eng Phys. 2007; 30(7):825-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.09.003. View

15.

Koehler S, Dhaher Y, Hansen A . Cross-validation of a portable, six-degree-of-freedom load cell for use in lower-limb prosthetics research. J Biomech. 2014; 47(6):1542-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.01.048. View

16.

Frossard L, Leech B, Pitkin M . Automated characterization of anthropomorphicity of prosthetic feet fitted to bone-anchored transtibial prosthesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019; . PMC: 6926161. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2904713. View

17.

Frossard L . Trends and Opportunities in Health Economic Evaluations of Prosthetic Care Innovations. Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2023; 4(2):36364. PMC: 10443521. DOI: 10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36364. View

18.

Pather S, Vertriest S, Sondergeld P, Ramis M, Frossard L . Load characteristics following transfemoral amputation in individuals fitted with bone-anchored prostheses: a scoping review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018; 16(6):1286-1310. DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003398. View

19.

Frossard L, Merlo G, Quincey T, Burkett B, Berg D . Development of a Procedure for the Government Provision of Bone-Anchored Prosthesis Using Osseointegration in Australia. Pharmacoecon Open. 2018; 1(4):301-314. PMC: 5711750. DOI: 10.1007/s41669-017-0032-5. View

20.

Berg D, Frossard L . Health Service Delivery and Economic Evaluation of Limb Lower Bone-Anchored Prostheses: A Summary of the Queensland Artificial Limb Service's Experience. Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2023; 4(2):36210. PMC: 10443483. DOI: 10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36210. View