» Articles » PMID: 35242847

Importance of Bitewing Radiographs for the Early Detection of Interproximal Carious Lesions and the Impact on Healthcare Expenditure in Japan

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2022 Mar 4
PMID 35242847
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Globally, the direct cost of dental caries is approximately $298B yearly, consuming 5-10% of national healthcare budgets. Bitewing radiographs (BWR) are the standard method of diagnosing interproximal dental caries. In Japan, bitewing radiographs are rarely used. This retrospective observational study was conducted to measure the potential economic impact of carious lesions left undiagnosed and untreated due to this omission of bitewing radiographs.

Methods: The total number of existing carious lesions, the number of undiagnosed lesions, and costs of treating these lesions were calculated from the national database of Ministry of Health, Labor and Wellness in Japan between June 2013 and 2017. The number of affected teeth was estimated using prevalence data and undiagnosed lesions were estimated. The expense associated with treating progressed lesions was calculated using the standard Japanese fee structure. BWR trends were assessed, and analyses were performed to understand the differences between states and populations over time.

Results: The average number of BWR taken monthly per office was 48.3±1.1 (average ± SD). It was calculated that an average of 6,429,155 lesions went undiagnosed per month, 93.5 teeth per practice, and 1.6 teeth per patient. The cost of treating lesions that went undiagnosed and then progressed into more invasive restorations was estimated to be between $57M-$218M more (difference between NaF varnish and class II restorations), and $150M-$443M more (difference between Class II restoration and crown or crown with RCT).

Conclusions: BWRs are crucial in diagnosing a significant number of carious lesions. There is considerable impact on health and cost to the national health system due to undiagnosed lesions. Practitioners need to be educated on reading and understanding BWR, and policy should be changed to cover BWR.

Citing Articles

Developing an AI-Powered Algorithm for Automated Detection and Classification of Dental Caries from Intraoral Radiographs: A Machine Learning Approach.

Haider M J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025; 16(Suppl 4):S3089-S3091.

PMID: 39926973 PMC: 11805296. DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1097_24.


Observational Diagnostics: The Building Block of AI-Powered Visual Aid for Dental Practitioners.

Raj R, Rajappa R, Murthy V, Osanlouy M, Lawrence D, Ganhewa M Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39851284 PMC: 11759822. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010009.


Developing the Benchmark: Establishing a Gold Standard for the Evaluation of AI Caries Diagnostics.

Boldt J, Schuster M, Krastl G, Schmitter M, Pfundt J, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999411 PMC: 11242122. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133846.


AI-Assisted Detection of Interproximal, Occlusal, and Secondary Caries on Bite-Wing Radiographs: A Single-Shot Deep Learning Approach.

Karakus R, Ozic M, Tassoker M J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; 37(6):3146-3159.

PMID: 38743125 PMC: 11612078. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01113-x.


Artificial intelligence for radiographic imaging detection of caries lesions: a systematic review.

Albano D, Galiano V, Basile M, Di Luca F, Gitto S, Messina C BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):274.

PMID: 38402191 PMC: 10894487. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04046-7.


References
1.
Pitts N . Are we ready to move from operative to non-operative/preventive treatment of dental caries in clinical practice?. Caries Res. 2004; 38(3):294-304. DOI: 10.1159/000077769. View

2.
Listl S, Galloway J, Mossey P, Marcenes W . Global Economic Impact of Dental Diseases. J Dent Res. 2015; 94(10):1355-61. DOI: 10.1177/0022034515602879. View

3.
Cury J, Tenuta L . Enamel remineralization: controlling the caries disease or treating early caries lesions?. Braz Oral Res. 2009; 23 Suppl 1:23-30. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242009000500005. View

4.
Astvaldsdottir A, Dagerhamn J, van Dijken J, Naimi-Akbar A, Sandborgh-Englund G, Tranaeus S . Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults – A systematic review. J Dent. 2015; 43(8):934-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001. View

5.
Schneiderman A, Elbaum M, Shultz T, Keem S, Greenebaum M, Driller J . Assessment of dental caries with Digital Imaging Fiber-Optic TransIllumination (DIFOTI): in vitro study. Caries Res. 1997; 31(2):103-10. DOI: 10.1159/000262384. View