A Specific Relationship Between Musical Sophistication and Auditory Working Memory

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2022 Mar 4

PMID 35241747

Authors

Meher Lad

Alexander J Billig

Sukhbinder Kumar

Timothy D Griffiths

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Previous studies have found conflicting results between individual measures related to music and fundamental aspects of auditory perception and cognition. The results have been difficult to compare because of different musical measures being used and lack of uniformity in the auditory perceptual and cognitive measures. In this study we used a general construct of musicianship, musical sophistication, that can be applied to populations with widely different backgrounds. We investigated the relationship between musical sophistication and measures of perception and working memory for sound by using a task suitable to measure both. We related scores from the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index to performance on tests of perception and working memory for two acoustic features-frequency and amplitude modulation. The data show that musical sophistication scores are best related to working memory for frequency in an analysis that accounts for age and non-verbal intelligence. Musical sophistication was not significantly associated with working memory for amplitude modulation rate or with the perception of either acoustic feature. The work supports a specific association between musical sophistication and working memory for sound frequency.

Citing Articles

Reliable Web-Based Auditory Cognitive Testing: Observational Study.

Lad M, Taylor J, Griffiths T J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26():e58444.

PMID: 39652871 PMC: 11667740. DOI: 10.2196/58444.

Introducing ART: A new method for testing auditory memory with circular reproduction tasks.

Karabay A, Nijenkamp R, Sarampalis A, Fougnie D Behav Res Methods. 2024; 56(8):8330-8348.

PMID: 39251527 PMC: 11525316. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02477-2.

Auditory Processing in Musicians, a Cross-Sectional Study, as a Basis for Auditory Training Optimization.

Kyrtsoudi M, Sidiras C, Papadelis G, Iliadou V Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(14).

PMID: 37510468 PMC: 10379437. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11142027.

Predicting speech-in-noise ability in normal and impaired hearing based on auditory cognitive measures.

Griffiths T Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1077344.

PMID: 36824211 PMC: 9941633. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1077344.

Performance on stochastic figure-ground perception varies with individual differences in speech-in-noise recognition and working memory capacity.

Johns M, Calloway R, Phillips I, Karuzis V, Dutta K, Smith E J Acoust Soc Am. 2023; 153(1):286.

PMID: 36732241 PMC: 9851714. DOI: 10.1121/10.0016756.

References

Kumar S, Joseph S, Pearson B, Teki S, Fox Z, Griffiths T . Resource allocation and prioritization in auditory working memory. Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 4(1):12-20. PMC: 3590753. DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2012.716416. View

Patel A . Can nonlinguistic musical training change the way the brain processes speech? The expanded OPERA hypothesis. Hear Res. 2013; 308:98-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.011. View

Mullensiefen D, Gingras B, Musil J, Stewart L . The musicality of non-musicians: an index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e89642. PMC: 3935919. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089642. View

Moore B, Wan J, Varathanathan A, Naddell S, Baer T . No Effect of Musical Training on Frequency Selectivity Estimated Using Three Methods. Trends Hear. 2019; 23:2331216519841980. PMC: 6535760. DOI: 10.1177/2331216519841980. View

Dugbartey A, Sanchez P, ROSENBAUM J, Mahurin R, Davis J, Townes B . WAIS-III Matrix Reasoning test performance in a mixed clinical sample. Clin Neuropsychol. 2000; 13(4):396-404. DOI: 10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT396. View

Nahum M, Daikhin L, Lubin Y, Cohen Y, Ahissar M . From comparison to classification: a cortical tool for boosting perception. J Neurosci. 2010; 30(3):1128-36. PMC: 3842462. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1781-09.2010. View

Mankel K, Bidelman G . Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(51):13129-13134. PMC: 6304957. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811793115. View

Talamini F, Blain S, Ginzburg J, Houix O, Bouchet P, Grassi M . Auditory and visual short-term memory: influence of material type, contour, and musical expertise. Psychol Res. 2021; 86(2):421-442. PMC: 8885540. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01519-0. View

Parbery-Clark A, Skoe E, Lam C, Kraus N . Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise. Ear Hear. 2009; 30(6):653-61. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b412e9. View

10.

Carey D, Rosen S, Krishnan S, Pearce M, Shepherd A, Aydelott J . Generality and specificity in the effects of musical expertise on perception and cognition. Cognition. 2015; 137:81-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.005. View

11.

Correia A, Vincenzi M, Vanzella P, Pinheiro A, Lima C, Schellenberg E . Can musical ability be tested online?. Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(2):955-969. PMC: 8357346. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01641-2. View

12.

Slevc L, Davey N, Buschkuehl M, Jaeggi S . Tuning the mind: Exploring the connections between musical ability and executive functions. Cognition. 2016; 152:199-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.017. View

13.

Schulze K, Tillmann B . Working memory for pitch, timbre, and words. Memory. 2012; 21(3):377-95. PMC: 4095971. DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2012.731070. View

14.

Parbery-Clark A, Strait D, Anderson S, Hittner E, Kraus N . Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise. PLoS One. 2011; 6(5):e18082. PMC: 3092743. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018082. View

15.

Lad M, Holmes E, Chu A, Griffiths T . Speech-in-noise detection is related to auditory working memory precision for frequency. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):13997. PMC: 7438331. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70952-9. View

16.

Gaab N, Schlaug G . The effect of musicianship on pitch memory in performance matched groups. Neuroreport. 2003; 14(18):2291-5. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200312190-00001. View

17.

Kraus N, Strait D, Parbery-Clark A . Cognitive factors shape brain networks for auditory skills: spotlight on auditory working memory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012; 1252:100-7. PMC: 3338202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06463.x. View

18.

Kishon-Rabin L, Amir O, Vexler Y, Zaltz Y . Pitch discrimination: are professional musicians better than non-musicians?. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2001; 12(2 Suppl):125-43. DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp.2001.12.2.125. View

19.

Bidelman G, Mankel K . Reply to Schellenberg: Is there more to auditory plasticity than meets the ear?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(8):2785-2786. PMC: 6386652. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1900068116. View

20.

Ahissar M, Nahum M, Nelken I, Hochstein S . Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008; 364(1515):285-99. PMC: 2674477. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0253. View