» Articles » PMID: 35236488

Reliability and Validity of the Hebrew Version of the Forgotten Joint Score for Assessing the Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Arthroplasty
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Mar 3
PMID 35236488
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This prospective study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the forgotten joint score-12 in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, because it is going to be used in the Hebrew-speaking populations in Israel.

Methods: The English version of forgotten joint score-12 was translated into Hebrew version by using the standard procedures and in collaboration with its authors. The consecutive patients who had undergone total knee arthroplasty in a single hospital were asked to fill out the Hebrew version of forgotten joint score-12, Oxford knee score, Short Form 12, and visual analog scale. A random subgroup of 60 patients were then asked to fill out a second Hebrew version of forgotten joint score-12 at a minimum of 2-week interval. The reliability was assessed in terms of internal consistency, test-retest reliability and split-half reliability. The validity was measured in terms of the outcomes as mentioned above.

Results: A total of 102 patients participated in the study. The Hebrew version of forgotten joint score-12 showed high reliability. The internal consistency was excellent (Cronbachs' α = 0.943) and test-retest reliability was high (Intraclass correlation = 0.97). The forgotten joint scores were correlated with the Oxford knee score, Short Form 12, and visual analog scale (r = 0.86, r = 0.72, and r=-0.8, respectively), indicating a high validity.

Conclusions: The Hebrew version of forgotten joint score-12 has excellent reliability, excellent test-retest reliability and good validity. It can be safely used for assessing outcomes of TKA.

Citing Articles

Forgotten joint score associated with prosthesis weight in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a prospective clinical study.

Zeng H, Li P, Feng W, Jie K, Chen J, Zeng J Front Surg. 2024; 11:1210668.

PMID: 39139397 PMC: 11319274. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1210668.


Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Forgotten Joint Score for knee arthroplasty.

Albishi W, AbuDujain N, Arafah O, Alshaygy I, Aldosari Z, Alhuqbani M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(10):4312-4318.

PMID: 37329371 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07484-y.

References
1.
Streiner D . Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003; 80(1):99-103. DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18. View

2.
Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A . Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(1):63-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b1.7859. View

3.
Marx R, Jones E, Atwan N, Closkey R, Salvati E, Sculco T . Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(9):1999-2005. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02286. View

4.
Bullens P, van Loon C, de Waal Malefijt M, Laan R, Veth R . Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16(6):740-7. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.23922. View

5.
Behrend H, Giesinger K, Giesinger J, Kuster M . The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 27(3):430-436.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.06.035. View