» Articles » PMID: 35236482

The Posterior Tibial Slope Does Not Influence the Flexion Angle in Posterior-stabilized Mobile-bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Arthroplasty
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Mar 3
PMID 35236482
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It remains uncertain whether an increase in the tibial slope leads to better flexion in posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee prostheses.

Purpose: To compare the intra-operative flexion angle between standard and an additional 10° posterior slope inserts.

Patients And Methods: Between December 2014 and February 2015, 22 patients (25 knees) who underwent PS mobile-bearing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included. Flexion angles were measured using either standard or specially-made inserts. Differences in flexion angles between the two situations were analyzed to determine the relationship between changes in flexion angle and pre-operative flexion angle or body mass index (BMI), and between intra- and post-operative flexion angle.

Results: The difference between the average flexion angle of standard inserts and specially-made inserts was not statistically significant. Although the correlations between changes in flexion angle due to insert difference and flexion angle, pre-operative flexion angle or BMI were not significant, there was a positive correlation between intra-operative and post-operative flexion at 2 years.

Conclusion: The results showed an additional posterior tibial slope by 10° did not affect the intra-operative flexion angle. Surgeons performing PS mobile-bearing TKA do not need to excessively slope the tibial bone cutting to improve the post-operative flexion angle.

Level Of Evidence: I, Experimental study.

Citing Articles

No significant clinical differences between native or reduced posterior tibial slope in kinematically aligned total knee replacement with posterior cruciate-retaining.

Cacciola G, Giustra F, Bosco F, Vezza D, Pirato F, Braconi L J Orthop. 2024; 54:32-37.

PMID: 38524363 PMC: 10957378. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.023.

References
1.
Minoda Y, Iwaki H, Ikebuchi M, Yoshida T, Nakamura H . The flexion gap preparation does not disturb the modified gap technique in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012; 19(6):832-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.03.007. View

2.
Schurman D, Rojer D . Total knee arthroplasty: range of motion across five systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (430):132-7. View

3.
Dai Y, Cross M, Angibaud L, Hamad C, Jung A, Jenny J . Posterior tibial slope impacts intraoperatively measured mid-flexion anteroposterior kinematics during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26(11):3325-3332. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-4877-7. View

4.
Catani F, Fantozzi S, Ensini A, Leardini A, Moschella D, Giannini S . Influence of tibial component posterior slope on in vivo knee kinematics in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2006; 24(4):581-7. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20121. View

5.
Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Todo S, Kobayashi A, Sakamoto H, Freeman M . Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(8):1199-200. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b8.10718. View