» Articles » PMID: 35236445

The Direct Anterior Approach for Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Short-term Efficacy Analysis

Overview
Journal Arthroplasty
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Mar 3
PMID 35236445
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Compared to the posterior approach (PA), the direct anterior approach (DAA) can achieve better clinical outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the same advantages associated with the DAA could be attained in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral THA.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed 89 patients who underwent one-stage bilateral THA through the DAA (group A, n = 46) and through the PA (group B, n = 43) between June 2015 and November 2017 at our institution. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year. There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hemoglobin level, preoperative Harris hip score (HHS), and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score between the two groups (P > 0.05 for all).

Results: The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, and the length of stay (LOS) were significantly less in group A than in group B (p < 0.05). The surgery-related complications were not significantly lower in group A (5.43%) than in group B (10.47%) (χ = 2.209, p = 0.112). In 46 cases in group A, one hip had an acetabular anteversion higher than normal value. In both groups, one hip developed aseptic loosening. The HHS was significantly higher in group A than in group B 1, 3, 12 month(s) after operation (p < 0.05). The VAS was significantly lower in group A than in group B 1, 3, 12 month(s) after operation. Against the simple Likert scale, comprehensive satisfaction was significantly higher in group A (97.8%, 45/46) than in group B (76.7%, 33/43) (χ = 9.119, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: In patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral THA, DAA could significantly relieve pain, accelerate the functional recovery of hip joint and improve the satisfaction more than PA. In clinical practice, however, more attention should be paid to strict compliance to operative indications and the prevention of early complications. The long-term effectiveness warrants further observation.

Citing Articles

Direct Anterior vs. Posterior Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

Machinski E, Leibovitch L, Park J, Sayudo I, Fernandes A, Liba T Cureus. 2024; 16(12):e75795.

PMID: 39687673 PMC: 11648815. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75795.


Intraoperative cell salvage reduces postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion and shortens off-bed time in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a single-center retrospective study.

Miao Z, Liu D, Chu Z, Zheng T, Li B, Liu P BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):685.

PMID: 39217321 PMC: 11365131. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07807-1.


Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Early Complications Between a Direct Anterior Approach or Posterolateral Approach in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.

Chen L, Sun S, Wang Q, Bahete A, Cai L, Kang P HSS J. 2023; 19(2):172-179.

PMID: 37065100 PMC: 10090840. DOI: 10.1177/15563316221145688.


The impact of unified discharge standards on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with hip fractures.

Zhao Y, Niu Z, Sun Q, Li Z, Liu Y, Wu Y Am J Transl Res. 2022; 14(10):7226-7232.

PMID: 36398228 PMC: 9641473.


Randomized Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Direct Anterior Approach Combined With Tendon Release and Repair After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Li G, Chen Q, Zhou W, Li P, Ma P, Liu T Front Surg. 2022; 9:845478.

PMID: 35388359 PMC: 8978716. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.845478.

References
1.
York P, Smarck C, Judet T, Mauffrey C . Total hip arthroplasty via the anterior approach: tips and tricks for primary and revision surgery. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(10):2041-2048. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3125-3. View

2.
Huang L, Xu T, Li P, Xu Y, Xia L, Zhao Z . Comparison of mortality and complications between bilateral simultaneous and staged total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(39):e16774. PMC: 6775426. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016774. View

3.
Husted H . Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: clinical and organizational aspects. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2012; 83(346):1-39. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2012.700593. View

4.
Aghayev E, Beck A, Staub L, Dietrich D, Melloh M, Orljanski W . Simultaneous bilateral hip replacement reveals superior outcome and fewer complications than two-stage procedures: a prospective study including 1819 patients and 5801 follow-ups from a total joint replacement registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11:245. PMC: 2987971. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-245. View

5.
Yoshii H, Oinuma K, Tamaki T, Miura Y, Kaneyama R, Shiratsuchi H . Comparison of patient satisfaction after unilateral or simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach: Evaluation using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire. J Orthop Sci. 2016; 21(3):332-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.008. View