» Articles » PMID: 35225903

Drop Jumping on Sand Is Characterized by Lower Power, Higher Rate of Force Development and Larger Knee Joint Range of Motion

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 28
PMID 35225903
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plyometric training on sand is suggested to result in advanced performance in vertical jumping. However, limited information exists concerning the biomechanics of drop jumps (DJ) on sand. The purpose of the study was to compare the biomechanical parameters of DJs executed on rigid (RIGID) and sand (SAND) surface. Sixteen high level male beach-volleyball players executed DJ from 40 cm on RIGID and SAND. Force- and video-recordings were analyzed to extract the kinetic and kinematic parameters of the DJ. Results of paired-samples t-tests revealed that DJ on SAND had significantly (p < 0.05) lower jumping height, peak vertical ground reaction force, power, peak leg stiffness and peak ankle flexion angular velocity than RIGID. In addition, DJ on SAND was characterized by significantly (p < 0.05) larger rate of force development and knee joint flexion in the downward phase. No differences (p > 0.05) were observed for the temporal parameters. The compliance of SAND decreases the efficiency of the mechanisms involved in the optimization of DJ performance. Nevertheless, SAND comprises an exercise surface with less loading during the eccentric phase of the DJ, thus it can be considered as a surface that can offer injury prevention under demands for large energy expenditure.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of surface type and time of day on agility course performance.

Pechette Markley A, Kieves N, Rivas L, Shoben A Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1415634.

PMID: 38988979 PMC: 11233466. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1415634.


Vertical Jump Kinetic Parameters on Sand and Rigid Surfaces in Young Female Volleyball Players with a Combined Background in Indoor and Beach Volleyball.

Giatsis G, Panoutsakopoulos V, Frese C, Kollias I J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023; 8(3).

PMID: 37606410 PMC: 10443322. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk8030115.


Exercise Evaluation and Prescription-Second Edition.

Foster C, Cortis C, Fusco A J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023; 8(1).

PMID: 36648897 PMC: 9844451. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk8010005.

References
1.
Giatsis G, Kollias I, Panoutsakopoulos V, Papaiakovou G . Biomechanical differences in elite beach-volleyball players in vertical squat jump on rigid and sand surface. Sports Biomech. 2004; 3(1):145-58. DOI: 10.1080/14763140408522835. View

2.
Viitasalo J, Salo A, Lahtinen J . Neuromuscular functioning of athletes and non-athletes in the drop jump. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998; 78(5):432-40. DOI: 10.1007/s004210050442. View

3.
Baca A . A comparison of methods for analyzing drop jump performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31(3):437-42. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199903000-00013. View

4.
Bobbert M, Huijing P, van Ingen Schenau G . Drop jumping. II. The influence of dropping height on the biomechanics of drop jumping. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987; 19(4):339-46. View

5.
Walshe A, Wilson G, Ettema G . Stretch-shorten cycle compared with isometric preload: contributions to enhanced muscular performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998; 84(1):97-106. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.1.97. View