» Articles » PMID: 35223211

Gut Microbiota Differences Between Paired Intestinal Wall and Digesta Samples in Three Small Species of Fish

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2022 Feb 28
PMID 35223211
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The microbial gut communities of fish are receiving increased attention for their relevance, among others, in a growing aquaculture industry. The members of these communities are often split into resident (long-term colonisers specialised to grow in and adhere to the mucus lining of the gut) and transient (short-term colonisers originated from food items and the surrounding water) microorganisms. Separating these two communities in small fish are impeded by the small size and fragility of the gastrointestinal tract. With the aim of testing whether it is possible to recover two distinct communities in small species of fish using a simple sampling technique, we used 16S amplicon sequencing of paired intestinal wall and digesta samples from three small Cyprinodontiformes fish. We examined the diversity and compositional variation of the two recovered communities, and we used joint species distribution modelling to identify microbes that are most likely to be a part of the resident community. For all three species we found that the diversity of intestinal wall samples was significantly lower compared to digesta samples and that the community composition between sample types was significantly different. Across the three species we found seven unique families of bacteria to be significantly enriched in samples from the intestinal wall, encompassing most of the 89 ASVs enriched in intestinal wall samples. We conclude that it is possible to characterise two different microbial communities and identify potentially resident microbes through separately analysing samples from the intestinal wall and digesta from small species of fish. We encourage researchers to be aware that different sampling procedures for gut microbiome characterization will capture different parts of the microbiome and that this should be taken into consideration when reporting results from such studies on small species of fish.

Citing Articles

The Gut Microbiota of Farmed and Wild Brook Trout (): Evaluation of Feed-Related Differences Using 16S rRNA Gene Metabarcoding.

Mugetti D, Pastorino P, Beltramo C, Audino T, Arillo A, Esposito G Microorganisms. 2023; 11(7).

PMID: 37512808 PMC: 10386504. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11071636.


Relationship between gut microbiota and Chinook salmon () health and growth performance in freshwater recirculating aquaculture systems.

Zhao R, Symonds J, Walker S, Steiner K, Carter C, Bowman J Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1065823.

PMID: 36825086 PMC: 9941681. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1065823.


Establishment of the Bacterial Microbiota in a Lab-Reared Model Teleost Fish, the Medaka .

Duval C, Marie B, Foucault P, Duperron S Microorganisms. 2022; 10(11).

PMID: 36422350 PMC: 9696534. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10112280.


Enriching captivity conditions with natural elements does not prevent the loss of wild-like gut microbiota but shapes its compositional variation in two small mammals.

Koziol A, Odriozola I, Nyholm L, Leonard A, San Jose C, Pauperio J Microbiologyopen. 2022; 11(5):e1318.

PMID: 36314753 PMC: 9517064. DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.1318.

References
1.
Rasmussen J, Villumsen K, Duchene D, Puetz L, Delmont T, Sveier H . Genome-resolved metagenomics suggests a mutualistic relationship between Mycoplasma and salmonid hosts. Commun Biol. 2021; 4(1):579. PMC: 8121932. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02105-1. View

2.
Sullam K, Essinger S, Lozupone C, OConnor M, Rosen G, Knight R . Environmental and ecological factors that shape the gut bacterial communities of fish: a meta-analysis. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21(13):3363-78. PMC: 3882143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05552.x. View

3.
Burns A, Miller E, Agarwal M, Rolig A, Milligan-Myhre K, Seredick S . Interhost dispersal alters microbiome assembly and can overwhelm host innate immunity in an experimental zebrafish model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(42):11181-11186. PMC: 5651736. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702511114. View

4.
Binladen J, Gilbert M, Bollback J, Panitz F, Bendixen C, Nielsen R . The use of coded PCR primers enables high-throughput sequencing of multiple homolog amplification products by 454 parallel sequencing. PLoS One. 2007; 2(2):e197. PMC: 1797623. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000197. View

5.
Quince C, Walker A, Simpson J, Loman N, Segata N . Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2017; 35(9):833-844. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3935. View