Performing Post-genome-wide Association Study Analysis: Overview, Challenges and Recommendations

Overview

Journal F1000Res

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Science

Date 2022 Feb 28

PMID 35222990

Authors

Yagoub Adam

Chaimae Samtal

Jean-Tristan Brandenburg

Oluwadamilare Falola

Ezekiel Adebiyi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide huge information on statistically significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with various human complex traits and diseases. By performing GWAS studies, scientists have successfully identified the association of hundreds of thousands to millions of SNPs to a single phenotype. Moreover, the association of some SNPs with rare diseases has been intensively tested. However, classic GWAS studies have not yet provided solid, knowledgeable insight into functional and biological mechanisms underlying phenotypes or mechanisms of diseases. Therefore, several post-GWAS (pGWAS) methods have been recommended. Currently, there is no simple scientific document to provide a quick guide for performing pGWAS analysis. pGWAS is a crucial step for a better understanding of the biological machinery beyond the SNPs. Here, we provide an overview to performing pGWAS analysis and demonstrate the challenges behind each method. Furthermore, we direct readers to key articles for each pGWAS method and present the overall issues in pGWAS analysis. Finally, we include a custom pGWAS pipeline to guide new users when performing their research.

Citing Articles

EmbedGEM: a framework to evaluate the utility of embeddings for genetic discovery.

Mukherjee S, McCaw Z, Pei J, Merkoulovitch A, Soare T, Tandon R Bioinform Adv. 2024; 4(1):vbae135.

PMID: 39664859 PMC: 11632179. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae135.

Second-order group knockoffs with applications to genome-wide association studies.

Chu B, Gu J, Chen Z, Morrison T, Candes E, He Z Bioinformatics. 2024; 40(10).

PMID: 39340798 PMC: 11639161. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae580.

Reply to McGowan et al.: An intronic polymorphism associated with 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate levels in human red blood cells is linked to expression of RhCE blood groups.

Earley E, DAlessandro A, Kaestner L, Page G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(36):e2413726121.

PMID: 39172773 PMC: 11388327. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2413726121.

SABER: Statistical Identification of Loci of Interest in GWAS Summary Statistics using a Bayesian Gaussian Mixture Model.

Kumar R, Venkatesh R, Ritchie M AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2024; 2024:575-583.

PMID: 38827044 PMC: 11141805.

Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses.

Schoeler T, Speed D, Porcu E, Pirastu N, Pingault J, Kutalik Z Nat Hum Behav. 2023; 7(7):1216-1227.

PMID: 37106081 PMC: 10365993. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01579-9.

References

Lin D, Sullivan P . Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies with overlapping subjects. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 85(6):862-72. PMC: 2790578. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.001. View

Teumer A . Common Methods for Performing Mendelian Randomization. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018; 5:51. PMC: 5985452. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00051. View

Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D . Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat Commun. 2017; 8(1):1826. PMC: 5705698. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5. View

Kofler R, Schlotterer C . Gowinda: unbiased analysis of gene set enrichment for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(15):2084-5. PMC: 3400962. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts315. View

Devlin B, Roeder K . Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics. 2001; 55(4):997-1004. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x. View

Peng G, Luo L, Siu H, Zhu Y, Hu P, Hong S . Gene and pathway-based second-wave analysis of genome-wide association studies. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009; 18(1):111-7. PMC: 2987176. DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.115. View

Deng Y, He T, Fang R, Li S, Cao H, Cui Y . Genome-Wide Gene-Based Multi-Trait Analysis. Front Genet. 2020; 11:437. PMC: 7248273. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00437. View

Cantor R, Lange K, Sinsheimer J . Prioritizing GWAS results: A review of statistical methods and recommendations for their application. Am J Hum Genet. 2010; 86(1):6-22. PMC: 2801749. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.017. View

Servin B, Stephens M . Imputation-based analysis of association studies: candidate regions and quantitative traits. PLoS Genet. 2007; 3(7):e114. PMC: 1934390. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030114. View

10.

de Leeuw C, Mooij J, Heskes T, Posthuma D . MAGMA: generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(4):e1004219. PMC: 4401657. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219. View

11.

Shahbaba B, Shachaf C, Yu Z . A pathway analysis method for genome-wide association studies. Stat Med. 2012; 31(10):988-1000. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4477. View

12.

Evangelou E, Ioannidis J . Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 14(6):379-89. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3472. View

13.

Davies N, Holmes M, Davey Smith G . Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ. 2018; 362:k601. PMC: 6041728. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k601. View

14.

Grace C, Farrall M, Watkins H, Goel A . Manhattan++: displaying genome-wide association summary statistics with multiple annotation layers. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019; 20(1):610. PMC: 6882345. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-019-3201-y. View

15.

Cano-Gamez E, Trynka G . From GWAS to Function: Using Functional Genomics to Identify the Mechanisms Underlying Complex Diseases. Front Genet. 2020; 11:424. PMC: 7237642. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00424. View

16.

Adam Y, Sadeeq S, Kumuthini J, Ajayi O, Wells G, Solomon R . Polygenic Risk Score in African populations: progress and challenges. F1000Res. 2023; 11:175. PMC: 10233318. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.76218.2. View

17.

Zeggini E, Ioannidis J . Meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies. Pharmacogenomics. 2009; 10(2):191-201. PMC: 2695132. DOI: 10.2217/14622416.10.2.191. View

18.

Chimusa E, Daya M, Moller M, Ramesar R, Henn B, van Helden P . Determining ancestry proportions in complex admixture scenarios in South Africa using a novel proxy ancestry selection method. PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e73971. PMC: 3774743. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073971. View

19.

Park J, Geum D, Eisenhut M, van der Vliet H, Shin J . Bayesian statistical methods in genetic association studies: Empirical examination of statistically non-significant Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) meta-analyses in cancers: A systematic review. Gene. 2018; 685:170-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.10.057. View

20.

Wootton R, Sallis H . Let's call it the effect allele: a suggestion for GWAS naming conventions. Int J Epidemiol. 2020; 49(5):1734-1735. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa149. View