» Articles » PMID: 35222885

Discovering Knee Osteoarthritis Imaging Features for Diagnosis and Prognosis: Review of Manual Imaging Grading and Machine Learning Approaches

Overview
Journal J Healthc Eng
Date 2022 Feb 28
PMID 35222885
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a deliberating joint disorder characterized by cartilage loss that can be captured by imaging modalities and translated into imaging features. Observing imaging features is a well-known objective assessment for knee OA disorder. However, the variety of imaging features is rarely discussed. This study reviews knee OA imaging features with respect to different imaging modalities for traditional OA diagnosis and updates recent image-based machine learning approaches for knee OA diagnosis and prognosis. Although most studies recognized X-ray as standard imaging option for knee OA diagnosis, the imaging features are limited to bony changes and less sensitive to short-term OA changes. Researchers have recommended the usage of MRI to study the hidden OA-related radiomic features in soft tissues and bony structures. Furthermore, ultrasound imaging features should be explored to make it more feasible for point-of-care diagnosis. Traditional knee OA diagnosis mainly relies on manual interpretation of medical images based on the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading scheme, but this approach is consistently prone to human resource and time constraints and less effective for OA prevention. Recent studies revealed the capability of machine learning approaches in automating knee OA diagnosis and prognosis, through three major tasks: knee joint localization (detection and segmentation), classification of OA severity, and prediction of disease progression. AI-aided diagnostic models improved the quality of knee OA diagnosis significantly in terms of time taken, reproducibility, and accuracy. Prognostic ability was demonstrated by several prediction models in terms of estimating possible OA onset, OA deterioration, progressive pain, progressive structural change, progressive structural change with pain, and time to total knee replacement (TKR) incidence. Despite research gaps, machine learning techniques still manifest huge potential to work on demanding tasks such as early knee OA detection and estimation of future disease events, as well as fundamental tasks such as discovering the new imaging features and establishment of novel OA status measure. Continuous machine learning model enhancement may favour the discovery of new OA treatment in future.

Citing Articles

Progress in multi-omics studies of osteoarthritis.

Wei Y, Qian H, Zhang X, Wang J, Yan H, Xiao N Biomark Res. 2025; 13(1):26.

PMID: 39934890 PMC: 11817798. DOI: 10.1186/s40364-025-00732-y.


A Review for automated classification of knee osteoarthritis using KL grading scheme for X-rays.

Tariq T, Suhail Z, Nawaz Z Biomed Eng Lett. 2025; 15(1):1-35.

PMID: 39781063 PMC: 11704124. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00437-5.


Automatic knee osteoarthritis severity grading based on X-ray images using a hierarchical classification method.

Pan J, Wu Y, Tang Z, Sun K, Li M, Sun J Arthritis Res Ther. 2024; 26(1):203.

PMID: 39558425 PMC: 11571664. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03416-4.


Optimizing knee osteoarthritis severity prediction on MRI images using deep stacking ensemble technique.

Panwar P, Chaurasia S, Gangrade J, Bilandi A, Pruthviraja D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26835.

PMID: 39500982 PMC: 11538306. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78203-x.


The value of deep learning-based X-ray techniques in detecting and classifying K-L grades of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhao H, Ou L, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Liu K, Kuang J Eur Radiol. 2024; 35(1):327-340.

PMID: 38997539 PMC: 11631813. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10928-9.


References
1.
Cui A, Li H, Wang D, Zhong J, Chen Y, Lu H . Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 29-30:100587. PMC: 7704420. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587. View

2.
Chang G, Park L, Le N, Jhun R, Surendran T, Lai J . Subchondral Bone Length in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Deep Learning-Derived Imaging Measure and Its Association With Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73(12):2240-2248. PMC: 8581065. DOI: 10.1002/art.41808. View

3.
Kobsar D, Masood Z, Khan H, Khalil N, Kiwan M, Ridd S . Wearable Inertial Sensors for Gait Analysis in Adults with Osteoarthritis-A Scoping Review. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(24). PMC: 7763184. DOI: 10.3390/s20247143. View

4.
Guan B, Liu F, Mizaian A, Demehri S, Samsonov A, Guermazi A . Deep learning approach to predict pain progression in knee osteoarthritis. Skeletal Radiol. 2021; 51(2):363-373. PMC: 9232386. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03773-0. View

5.
Chan L, Li H, Chan P, Wen C . A machine learning-based approach to decipher multi-etiology of knee osteoarthritis onset and deterioration. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022; 3(1):100135. PMC: 9718099. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100135. View