» Articles » PMID: 35222185

How to Effectively Display Sponsorship Information: The Influences of External Time Cues and Information Type on Individuals' Evaluations

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2022 Feb 28
PMID 35222185
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Time, an important, yet scarce resource in daily living, affects cognition, decision-making, and behavior in various ways. For instance, in marketing practice, time-bound strategies are often employed to influence consumer behavior. Thus, understanding and mastering a target market from a temporal perspective can contribute to the ease with which marketers and businesses formulate marketing strategies. Accordingly, this research conducts three studies to explore the influence of temporal framing as an external time cue on the evaluation of sponsorship-linked marketing campaigns. The studies show that future-framed participants adopted a global processing style. In this context, providing information about the sponsoring brand and sponsored event induced a more positive evaluation of future campaigns. However, in a past-frame context, participants were less likely to adopt a global processing style. Here, providing brand sponsor information alone increased the likelihood of a positive evaluation of past campaigns. Ultimately, the findings provide a theoretical basis for decision-making utilizing the influence of activities and events to enhance brand image.

Citing Articles

Value delivery in green consumption: the effect of advertisement value proposition on consumer perception and purchase intention.

Zhang Y, Liu J, Li X Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1339197.

PMID: 38323163 PMC: 10844521. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1339197.

References
1.
Forster J, Liberman N, Kuschel S . The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008; 94(4):579-99. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.579. View

2.
Preacher K, Hayes A . Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3):879-91. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. View

3.
Forster J, Liberman N, Shapira O . Preparing for novel versus familiar events: shifts in global and local processing. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009; 138(3):383-99. DOI: 10.1037/a0015748. View

4.
Forster J . Local and global cross-modal influences between vision and hearing, tasting, smelling, or touching. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011; 140(3):364-89. DOI: 10.1037/a0023175. View

5.
Fischhoff B . Hindsight not equal to foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. 1975. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12(4):304-11; discussion 311-2. PMC: 1743746. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.304. View