» Articles » PMID: 35217902

Role of PSMA-ligands Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma Management: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Abstract

Background: Renal masses detection is continually increasing worldwide, with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) accounting for approximately 90% of all renal cancers and remaining one of the most aggressive urological malignancies. Despite improvements in cancer management, accurate diagnosis and treatment strategy of RCC by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are still challenging. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is known to be highly expressed on the endothelial cells of the neovasculature of several solid tumors other than prostate cancer, including RCC. In this context, recent preliminary studies reported a promising role for positron emission tomography (PET)/CT with radiolabeled molecules targeting PSMA, in alternative to fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in RCC patients.

Purpose: The aim of our review is to provide an updated overview of current evidences and major limitations regarding the use of PSMA PET/CT in RCC.

Methods: A literature search, up to 31 December 2021, was performed using the following electronic databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.

Results: The findings of this review suggest that PSMA PET/CT could represent a valid imaging option for diagnosis, staging, and therapy response evaluation in RCC, particularly in clear cell RCC.

Conclusions: Further studies are needed for this "relatively" new imaging modality to consolidate its indications, timing, and practical procedures.

Citing Articles

Vesicles Secreted by Renal Cell Carcinoma Cells Cause Vascular Endothelial Cells to Express PSMA and Drive Tumor Progression.

Watanabe R, Kagimoto K, Chosei M, Sakaue T, Kurata M, Miura N Cells. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39936957 PMC: 11817738. DOI: 10.3390/cells14030165.


Theranostics in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Step Towards New Opportunities or a Dead End-A Systematic Review.

Jozwik-Plebanek K, Saracyn M, Kolodziej M, Kaminska O, Durma A, Madra W Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 17(12.

PMID: 39770563 PMC: 11678666. DOI: 10.3390/ph17121721.


ESR Bridges: renal cell carcinoma-a multidisciplinary view.

Miron Mombiela R, Thomsen F, Fuglo D, Hasselager T, Moller A Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39661148 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11270-w.


Imaging assessment of prostate cancer recurrence: advances in detection of local and systemic relapse.

Muglia V, Laschena L, Pecoraro M, de Lion Gouvea G, Colli L, Panebianco V Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(2):807-826.

PMID: 39254707 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04412-7.


The impact of PET imaging on triple negative breast cancer: an updated evidence-based perspective.

Filippi L, Urso L, Ferrari C, Guglielmo P, Evangelista L Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 52(1):263-279.

PMID: 39110196 PMC: 11599309. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06866-9.


References
1.
Baccala A, Sercia L, Li J, Heston W, Zhou M . Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in tumor-associated neovasculature of renal neoplasms. Urology. 2007; 70(2):385-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.025. View

2.
Rowe S, Gorin M, Hammers H, Som Javadi M, Hawasli H, Szabo Z . Imaging of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma with PSMA-targeted ¹⁸F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2015; 29(10):877-82. PMC: 4666821. DOI: 10.1007/s12149-015-1017-z. View

3.
Hou G, Zhao D, Jiang Y, Zhu Z, Huo L, Li F . Clinical utility of FDG PET/CT for primary and recurrent papillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Imaging. 2021; 21(1):25. PMC: 7908760. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-021-00393-8. View

4.
Uijen M, Derks Y, Merkx R, Schilham M, Roosen J, Prive B . PSMA radioligand therapy for solid tumors other than prostate cancer: background, opportunities, challenges, and first clinical reports. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48(13):4350-4368. PMC: 8566635. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05433-w. View

5.
Ma H, Shen G, Liu B, Yang Y, Ren P, Kuang A . Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in restaging renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2016; 38(2):156-163. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000618. View