» Articles » PMID: 35214356

Toward the Personalization of Biceps Fatigue Detection Model for Gym Activity: An Approach to Utilize Wearables' Data from the Crowd

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Feb 26
PMID 35214356
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nowadays, wearables-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems represent a modern, robust, and lightweight solution to monitor athlete performance. However, user data variability is a problem that may hinder the performance of HAR systems, especially the cross-subject HAR models. Such a problem may have a lesser effect on the subject-specific model because it is a tailored model that serves a specific user; hence, data variability is usually low, and performance is often high. However, such a performance comes with a high cost in data collection and processing per user. Therefore, in this work, we present a personalized model that achieves higher performance than the cross-subject model while maintaining a lower data cost than the subject-specific model. Our personalization approach sources data from the crowd based on similarity scores computed between the test subject and the individuals in the crowd. Our dataset consists of 3750 concentration curl repetitions from 25 volunteers with ages and BMI ranging between 20-46 and 24-46, respectively. We compute 11 hand-crafted features and train 2 personalized AdaBoost models, Decision Tree (AdaBoost-DT) and Artificial Neural Networks (AdaBoost-ANN), using data from whom the test subject shares similar physical and single traits. Our findings show that the AdaBoost-DT model outperforms the cross-subject-DT model by 5.89%, while the AdaBoost-ANN model outperforms the cross-subject-ANN model by 3.38%. On the other hand, at 50.0% less of the test subject's data consumption, our AdaBoost-DT model outperforms the subject-specific-DT model by 16%, while the AdaBoost-ANN model outperforms the subject-specific-ANN model by 10.33%. Yet, the subject-specific models achieve the best performances at 100% of the test subjects' data consumption.

Citing Articles

Data-Driven Approach for Upper Limb Fatigue Estimation Based on Wearable Sensors.

Otalora S, Segatto M, Monteiro M, Munera M, Diaz C, Cifuentes C Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(22).

PMID: 38005677 PMC: 10674769. DOI: 10.3390/s23229291.

References
1.
Enoka R, Duchateau J . Muscle fatigue: what, why and how it influences muscle function. J Physiol. 2007; 586(1):11-23. PMC: 2375565. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139477. View

2.
Elshafei M, Costa D, Shihab E . On the Impact of Biceps Muscle Fatigue in Human Activity Recognition. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(4). PMC: 7913896. DOI: 10.3390/s21041070. View

3.
Igual R, Medrano C, Plaza I . A comparison of public datasets for acceleration-based fall detection. Med Eng Phys. 2015; 37(9):870-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.06.009. View

4.
Kobsar D, Ferber R . Wearable Sensor Data to Track Subject-Specific Movement Patterns Related to Clinical Outcomes Using a Machine Learning Approach. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(9). PMC: 6163443. DOI: 10.3390/s18092828. View

5.
Burkhauser R, Cawley J . Beyond BMI: the value of more accurate measures of fatness and obesity in social science research. J Health Econ. 2008; 27(2):519-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.05.005. View