» Articles » PMID: 35214310

Intelligent Clinical Decision Support

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Feb 26
PMID 35214310
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early recognition of pathologic cardiorespiratory stress and forecasting cardiorespiratory decompensation in the critically ill is difficult even in highly monitored patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Instability can be intuitively defined as the overt manifestation of the failure of the host to adequately respond to cardiorespiratory stress. The enormous volume of patient data available in ICU environments, both of high-frequency numeric and waveform data accessible from bedside monitors, plus Electronic Health Record (EHR) data, presents a platform ripe for Artificial Intelligence (AI) approaches for the detection and forecasting of instability, and data-driven intelligent clinical decision support (CDS). Building unbiased, reliable, and usable AI-based systems across health care sites is rapidly becoming a high priority, specifically as these systems relate to diagnostics, forecasting, and bedside clinical decision support. The ICU environment is particularly well-positioned to demonstrate the value of AI in saving lives. The goal is to create AI models embedded in a real-time CDS for forecasting and mitigation of critical instability in ICU patients of sufficient readiness to be deployed at the bedside. Such a system must leverage multi-source patient data, machine learning, systems engineering, and human action expertise, the latter being key to successful CDS implementation in the clinical workflow and evaluation of bias. We present one approach to create an operationally relevant AI-based forecasting CDS system.

Citing Articles

Overview of Wearable Healthcare Devices for Clinical Decision Support in the Prehospital Setting.

Gathright R, Mejia I, Gonzalez J, Hernandez Torres S, Berard D, Snider E Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771939 PMC: 11679471. DOI: 10.3390/s24248204.


Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Outcomes in Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Armoundas A, Narayan S, Arnett D, Spector-Bagdady K, Bennett D, Celi L Circulation. 2024; 149(14):e1028-e1050.

PMID: 38415358 PMC: 11042786. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001201.


Data Representation Structure to Support Clinical Decision-Making in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Interview Study and Preliminary Decision Support Interface Design.

Yakob N, Laliberte S, Doyon-Poulin P, Jouvet P, Noumeir R JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e49497.

PMID: 38300695 PMC: 10870206. DOI: 10.2196/49497.


Collaborative strategies for deploying AI-based physician decision support systems: challenges and deployment approaches.

Mittermaier M, Raza M, Kvedar J NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):137.

PMID: 37543707 PMC: 10404285. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00889-6.

References
1.
Wolff R, Moons K, Riley R, Whiting P, Westwood M, Collins G . PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170(1):51-58. DOI: 10.7326/M18-1376. View

2.
Laird P, Wertz A, Welter G, Maslove D, Hamilton A, Yoon J . The critical care data exchange format: a proposed flexible data standard for combining clinical and high-frequency physiologic data in critical care. Physiol Meas. 2021; 42(6). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/abfc9b. View

3.
Jeanselme V, De-Arteaga M, Elmer J, Perman S, Dubrawski A . Sex differences in post cardiac arrest discharge locations. Resusc Plus. 2021; 8:100185. PMC: 8654620. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100185. View

4.
Goddard K, Roudsari A, Wyatt J . Automation bias: a systematic review of frequency, effect mediators, and mitigators. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 19(1):121-7. PMC: 3240751. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000089. View

5.
Lebiere C, Blaha L, Fallon C, Jefferson B . Adaptive Cognitive Mechanisms to Maintain Calibrated Trust and Reliance in Automation. Front Robot AI. 2021; 8:652776. PMC: 8181412. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.652776. View