» Articles » PMID: 35212515

Practical and Science-Based Strategy for Establishing Acceptable Intakes for Drug Product -Nitrosamine Impurities

Abstract

The potential for -nitrosamine impurities in pharmaceutical products presents a challenge for the quality management of medicinal products. -Nitrosamines are considered cohort-of-concern compounds due to the potent carcinogenicity of many of the structurally simple chemicals within this structural class. In the past 2 years, a number of drug products containing certain active pharmaceutical ingredients have been withdrawn or recalled from the market due to the presence of carcinogenic low-molecular-weight ,-dialkylnitrosamine impurities. Regulatory authorities have issued guidance to market authorization holders to review all commercial drug substances/products for the potential risk of -nitrosamine impurities, and in cases where a significant risk of -nitrosamine impurity is identified, analytical confirmatory testing is required. A key factor to consider prior to analytical testing is the estimation of the daily acceptable intake (AI) of the -nitrosamine impurity. A significant proportion of -nitrosamine drug product impurities are unique/complex structures for which the development of low-level analytical methods is challenging. Moreover, these unique/complex impurities may be less potent carcinogens compared to simple nitrosamines. In the present work, our objective was to derive AIs for a large number of complex -nitrosamines without carcinogenicity data that were identified as potential low-level impurities. The impurities were first cataloged and grouped according to common structural features, with a total of 13 groups defined with distinct structural features. Subsequently, carcinogenicity data were reviewed for structurally related -nitrosamines relevant to each of the 13 structural groups and group AIs were derived conservatively based on the most potent -nitrosamine within each group. The 13 structural group AIs were used as the basis for assigning AIs to each of the structurally related complex -nitrosamine impurities. The AIs of several -nitrosamine groups were found to be considerably higher than those for the simple ,-dialkylnitrosamines, which translates to commensurately higher analytical method detection limits.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning in Early Prediction of Metabolism of Drugs.

Lettieri M, Rodda M, Carlucci V Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2834:275-291.

PMID: 39312170 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4003-6_13.


Quantum chemical calculations of nitrosamine activation and deactivation pathways for carcinogenicity risk assessment.

Goller A, Johanssen S, Zalewski A, Ziegler V Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1415266.

PMID: 39086387 PMC: 11288830. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1415266.


Effect of Antioxidants in Medicinal Products on Intestinal Drug Transporters.

Kulkarni C, Yang J, Koleske M, Lara G, Alam K, Raw A Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(5).

PMID: 38794309 PMC: 11124870. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050647.


Synthesis and Trace-Level Quantification of Mutagenic and Cohort-of-Concern Ciprofloxacin Nitroso Drug Substance-Related Impurities (NDSRIs) and Other Nitroso Impurities Using UPLC-ESI-MS/MS-Method Optimization Using I-Optimal Mixture Design.

Nakka S, Kumar Katari N, Muchakayala S, Babu Jonnalagadda S, Manabolu Surya S ACS Omega. 2024; 9(8):8773-8788.

PMID: 38434810 PMC: 10905725. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c05170.


Nitrosamine Impurities in Pharmaceuticals: An Empirical Review of their Detection, Mechanisms, and Regulatory Approaches.

Bhirud D, Agrawal G, Shah H, Patel A, Palkar M, Bhattacharya S Curr Top Med Chem. 2024; 24(6):503-522.

PMID: 38321910 DOI: 10.2174/0115680266278636240125113509.


References
1.
Cross K, Ponting D . Developing Structure-Activity Relationships for -Nitrosamine Activity. Comput Toxicol. 2021; 20. PMC: 8659209. DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100186. View

2.
Thresher A, Gosling J, Williams R . Generation of TD values for carcinogenicity study data. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2019; 8(5):696-703. PMC: 6762014. DOI: 10.1039/c9tx00118b. View

3.
Boyland E, Roe F, Gorrod J, MITCHLEY B . THE CARCINOGENICITY OF NITROSOANABASINE, A POSSIBLE CONSTITUENT OF TOBACCO SMOKE. Br J Cancer. 1964; 18:265-70. PMC: 2071297. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1964.31. View

4.
Kroes R, Renwick A, Cheeseman M, Kleiner J, Mangelsdorf I, Piersma A . Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. Food Chem Toxicol. 2003; 42(1):65-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2003.08.006. View

5.
Lijinsky W, Reuber M, Davies T, RIGGS C . Dose-response studies with nitroso-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine and dinitrosohomopiperazine in F344 rats. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1982; 6(6):513-27. DOI: 10.1016/0147-6513(82)90033-1. View