» Articles » PMID: 35211818

Common Network Effect-patterns After Monoamine Reuptake Inhibition in Dissociated Hippocampus Cultures

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2022 Feb 25
PMID 35211818
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder with currently available antidepressant drugs is still unsatisfying as response to medication is delayed and in some patients even non-existent. To understand complex psychiatric diseases such as major depressive disorder and their treatment, research focus is shifting from investigating single neurons towards a view of the entire functional and effective neuronal network, because alterations on single synapses through antidepressant drugs may translate to alterations in the entire network. Here, we examined the effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors on in vitro hippocampal network dynamics using calcium fluorescence imaging and analyzing the data with means of graph theoretical parameters. Hypothesizing that monoamine reuptake inhibitors operate through changes of effective connectivity on micro-scale neuronal networks, we measured the effects of the selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors GBR-12783, Sertraline, Venlafaxine, and Amitriptyline on neuronal networks. We identified a common pattern of effects of the different tested monoamine reuptake inhibitors. After treatment with GBR-12783, Sertraline, and Venlafaxine, the connectivity degree, measuring the number of existing connections in the network, was significantly decreased. All tested substances led to networks with more submodules and a reduced global efficiency. No monoamine reuptake inhibitor did affect network-wide firing rate, the characteristic path length, or the network strength. In our study, we found that monoamine reuptake inhibition in neuronal networks in vitro results in a sharpening of the network structure. These alterations could be the basis for the reorganization of a large-scale miswired network in major depressive disorder.

Citing Articles

Network Reconstruction as a Novel High-Level Marker of Functional Neuronal Viability.

Dahlmanns J, Dahlmanns M Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2644:47-63.

PMID: 37142915 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3052-5_4.

References
1.
Achard S, Bullmore E . Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007; 3(2):e17. PMC: 1794324. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017. View

2.
Andrade C, Kumar Rao N . How antidepressant drugs act: A primer on neuroplasticity as the eventual mediator of antidepressant efficacy. Indian J Psychiatry. 2011; 52(4):378-86. PMC: 3025168. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.74318. View

3.
Andreescu C, Tudorascu D, Butters M, Tamburo E, Patel M, Price J . Resting state functional connectivity and treatment response in late-life depression. Psychiatry Res. 2013; 214(3):313-21. PMC: 3865521. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.08.007. View

4.
Bassett D, Sporns O . Network neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2017; 20(3):353-364. PMC: 5485642. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4502. View

5.
Belujon P, Grace A . Dopamine System Dysregulation in Major Depressive Disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017; 20(12):1036-1046. PMC: 5716179. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx056. View