» Articles » PMID: 35209733

Outcomes of Surgical Reconstruction Using Custom 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Implants for Critical-Sized Bone Defects of the Foot and Ankle

Overview
Journal Foot Ankle Int
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Feb 25
PMID 35209733
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Treating critically sized defects (CSDs) of bone remains a significant challenge in foot and ankle surgery. Custom 3D-printed implants are being offered to a small but growing subset of patients as a salvage procedure in lieu of traditional alternates such as structural allografts after the patient has failed prior procedures. The long-term outcomes of 3D-printed implants are still unknown and understudied because of the limited number of cases and short follow-up durations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who received custom 3D-printed implants to treat CSDs of the foot and ankle in an attempt to aid surgeons in selecting appropriate surgical candidates.

Methods: This was a retrospective study to assess surgical outcomes of patients who underwent implantation of a custom 3D-printed implant made with medical-grade titanium alloy powder (Ti-6Al-4V) to treat CSDs of the foot and ankle between June 1, 2014, and September 30, 2019. All patients had failed previous nonoperative or operative management before proceeding with treatment with a custom 3D-printed implant. Univariate and multivariate odds ratios (ORs) of a secondary surgery and implant removal were calculated for perioperative variables.

Results: There were 39 cases of patients who received a custom 3D-printed implant with at least 1 year of follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 27.0 (12-74) months. Thirteen of 39 cases (33.3%) required a secondary surgery and 10 of 39 (25.6%) required removal of the implant because of septic nonunion (6/10) or aseptic nonunion (4/10). The mean time to secondary surgery was 10 months (1-22). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that patients with neuropathy were more likely to require a secondary surgery with an OR of 5.76 ( = .03).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that 74% of patients who received a custom 3D-printed implant for CSDs did not require as subsequent surgery (minimum of 1-year follow-up). Neuropathy was significantly associated with the need for a secondary surgery. This is the largest series to date demonstrating the efficacy of 3D-printed custom titanium implants. As the number of cases using patient-specific 3D-printed titanium implant increases, larger cohorts of patients should be studied to identify other high-risk groups and possible interventions to improve surgical outcomes.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Citing Articles

The rational design, biofunctionalization and biological properties of orthopedic porous titanium implants: a review.

Guo C, Ding T, Cheng Y, Zheng J, Fang X, Feng Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1548675.

PMID: 40078794 PMC: 11897010. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1548675.


Custom Three-Dimensional Printed Scaffolds or Implants in Patients With Segmental Bone Loss of the Foot and Ankle: A Single-Centre Case Series.

Wells J, Walls A, Morash J Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78309.

PMID: 40034888 PMC: 11872678. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78309.


Morselized Femoral Head Impaction Bone Grafting of Large Defects in Ankle and Hindfoot Fusions.

Clough T, Jamjoom B, Jagani N, Quarcoopome J, Kakwani R, Townshend D Foot Ankle Int. 2025; :10711007241310411.

PMID: 39868573 PMC: 11894856. DOI: 10.1177/10711007241310411.


Surgical Planning and 3D-Printed Mesh Implant for Effective Bone Gap Management: A Case Report.

Kachare A, Goregaonkar A, Purohit S, Munde K, Renthlei L, Gaur B J Orthop Case Rep. 2024; 14(11):203-207.

PMID: 39524287 PMC: 11546020. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i11.4968.


Applying 3D-Printed Porous Ti6Al4V Prostheses to Repair Osteomyelitis-Induced Partial Bone Defects of Lower Limbs: Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Outcomes.

Liu B, Tan Q, Wang Z, Hou G, Wang C, Tian Y Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(1):115-124.

PMID: 39429061 PMC: 11735359. DOI: 10.1111/os.14268.


References
1.
Bakri K, Stans A, Mardini S, Moran S . Combined massive allograft and intramedullary vascularized fibula transfer: the capanna technique for lower-limb reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 2010; 22(3):234-41. PMC: 2884882. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1081406. View

2.
Kadam D . Limb salvage surgery. Indian J Plast Surg. 2014; 46(2):265-74. PMC: 3901908. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.118603. View

3.
Sidambe A . Biocompatibility of Advanced Manufactured Titanium Implants-A Review. Materials (Basel). 2017; 7(12):8168-8188. PMC: 5456424. DOI: 10.3390/ma7128168. View

4.
Caffrey J, Cory E, Wong V, Masuda K, Chen A, Hunt J . Ex vivo loading of trussed implants for spine fusion induces heterogeneous strains consistent with homeostatic bone mechanobiology. J Biomech. 2016; 49(16):4090-4097. PMC: 5164966. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.051. View

5.
Ricles L, Coburn J, Di Prima M, Oh S . Regulating 3D-printed medical products. Sci Transl Med. 2018; 10(461). DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan6521. View