» Articles » PMID: 35207034

Hollow-Fiber Membrane Contactor for Biogas Recovery from Real Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Permeate

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 25
PMID 35207034
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study demonstrates the application of hollow-fiber membrane contactors (HFMCs) for the recovery of biogas from the ultrafiltration permeate of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) and synthetic effluents of pure and mixed CH and CO. The developed membrane degassing setup was coupled with a pilot-scale AnMBR fed with synthetic domestic effluent working at 25 °C. The membrane degassing unit was able to recover 93% of the total dissolved CH and 83% of the dissolved CO in the first two hours of permeate recirculation. The initial recovery rates were very high (0.21 mg CH L min and 8.43 mg CO L min) and the membrane was able to achieve a degassing efficiency of 95.7% for CH and 76.2% for CO, at a gas to liquid ratio of 1. A higher mass transfer coefficient of CH was found in all experimental and theoretical evaluations compared to CO. This could also be confirmed from the higher transmembrane mass transport resistance to CO rather than CH found in this work. A strong dependency of the selective gas transport on the gas and liquid side hydrodynamics was observed. An increase in the liquid flow rate and gas flow rate favored CH transport and CO transport, respectively, over each component. The results confirmed the effectiveness of the collective AnMBR and membrane degassing setup for biogas recovery. Still, additional work is required to improve the membrane contactor's performance for biogas recovery during long-term operation.

Citing Articles

Membrane Applications in Autologous Cell Therapy.

Martin R, Lei R, Zeng Y, Zhu J, Chang H, Ye H Membranes (Basel). 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36557091 PMC: 9788437. DOI: 10.3390/membranes12121182.

References
1.
Galib M, Elbeshbishy E, Reid R, Hussain A, Lee H . Energy-positive food wastewater treatment using an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR). J Environ Manage. 2016; 182:477-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.098. View

2.
Aslam M, Ahmad R, Yasin M, Khan A, Shahid M, Hossain S . Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for biohydrogen production: Recent developments, challenges and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 269:452-464. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.050. View

3.
Crone B, Garland J, Sorial G, Vane L . Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: A review. Water Res. 2016; 104:520-531. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.019. View

4.
Layer M, Adler A, Reynaert E, Hernandez A, Pagni M, Morgenroth E . Organic substrate diffusibility governs microbial community composition, nutrient removal performance and kinetics of granulation of aerobic granular sludge. Water Res X. 2019; 4:100033. PMC: 6614711. DOI: 10.1016/j.wroa.2019.100033. View

5.
Zhang M, Liao B, Zhou X, He Y, Hong H, Lin H . Effects of hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of membrane on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol. 2014; 175:59-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.058. View