» Articles » PMID: 35205730

Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications After Resection of Esophageal Cancer

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Feb 25
PMID 35205730
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth-leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. Esophagectomy is the most effective treatment for patients without invasion of adjacent organs or distant metastasis. Complications and relevant problems may occur in the early post-operative course or in a delayed fashion. Here, innovative endoscopic techniques for the treatment of postsurgical problems were developed during the past 20 years.

Methods: Endoscopic treatment strategies for the following postoperative complications are presented: anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic insufficiency, delayed gastric passage and anastomotic stenosis. Based on a literature review covering the last two decades, therapeutic procedures are presented and analyzed.

Results: Addressing the four complications mentioned, clipping, stenting, injection therapy, dilatation, and negative pressure therapy are successfully utilized as endoscopic treatment techniques today.

Conclusion: Endoscopic treatment plays a major role in both early-postoperative and long-term aftercare. During the past 20 years, essential therapeutic measures have been established. A continuous development of these techniques in the field of endoscopy can be expected.

Citing Articles

The Impact of EndoVAC in Addressing Post-Esophagectomy Anastomotic Leak in Esophageal Cancer Management.

Papadakos S, Argyrou A, Katsaros I, Lekakis V, Mpouga G, Vergadis C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685572 PMC: 11642085. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237113.


Endoscopic Management of Bleeding in Altered Anatomy after Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Gibiino G, Binda C, Secco M, Giuffrida P, Coluccio C, Perini B Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(11).

PMID: 38003990 PMC: 10672978. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59111941.


Time to endoscopic vacuum therapy-lessons learned after > 150 robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomies (RAMIE) at a German high-volume center.

Chon S, Brunner S, Muller D, Lorenz F, Stier R, Streller L Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(1):741-748.

PMID: 36344896 PMC: 9640783. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09754-1.


Risk Factors of Benign Stricture of Anastomotic Stoma after Esophagectomy and Therapeutic Effect of Stent Implantation.

Wu G, Niu L, Yang Y, Tian S, Liu Y, Wang C Emerg Med Int. 2022; 2022:2605592.

PMID: 36081957 PMC: 9448601. DOI: 10.1155/2022/2605592.


Comparison of Two Endoscopic Therapeutic Interventions as Primary Treatment for Anastomotic Leakages after Total Gastrectomy.

Senne M, Werner C, Schempf U, Thiel K, Konigsrainer A, Wichmann D Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(12).

PMID: 35740645 PMC: 9220783. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122982.

References
1.
Schorsch T, Muller C, Loske G . [Endoscopic vacuum therapy of perforations and anastomotic insufficiency of the esophagus]. Chirurg. 2014; 85(12):1081-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-014-2764-4. View

2.
Xu J, Chen T, Elkholy S, Xu M, Zhong Y, Zhang Y . Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) as a Treatment for Refractory Gastroparesis: Long-Term Outcomes. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 2018:6409698. PMC: 6217887. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6409698. View

3.
Snape W, Lin M, Agarwal N, Shaw R . Evaluation of the pylorus with concurrent intraluminal pressure and EndoFLIP in patients with nausea and vomiting. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016; 28(5):758-64. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12772. View

4.
Mencio M, Ontiveros E, Burdick J, Leeds S . Use of a novel technique to manage gastrointestinal leaks with endoluminal negative pressure: a single institution experience. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32(7):3349-3356. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6055-x. View

5.
Fumagalli U, Baiocchi G, Celotti A, Parise P, Cossu A, Bonavina L . Incidence and treatment of mediastinal leakage after esophagectomy: Insights from the multicenter study on mediastinal leaks. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25(3):356-366. PMC: 6343094. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.356. View