» Articles » PMID: 35204866

The Effect of Corrective Feedback in Basic Cognitive Tasks: A Study in Early Childhood

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of trial-by-trial corrective feedback in a go-no-go task for children. A sample of 40 preschool students, divided into 4- and 5-year-olds, participated in the study, as well as a group of 20 university students. All the groups performed the task in a counterbalanced design of blocks with and without corrective feedback. Reaction time and accuracy rate were measured as dependent variables. Moreover, reaction time was also analyzed through an ex-Gaussian fit. Children were slightly more accurate and slower under the presence of corrective feedback, suggesting a more conservative pattern. University students were faster, but corrective feedback did not reach the statistical level. Regarding reaction time components, a reduction of the distribution tails, depicted by the τ parameter, was found for both groups under the corrective feedback condition. This suggests that parameterization of reaction time can be considered as a strategy for a more detailed analysis to examine the effect of corrective feedback, even at early ages. In this way, corrective feedback depicted beneficial effects in the τ parameter at early ages, suggesting its use in basic cognitive tasks based on go-no-go but not for older groups.

Citing Articles

Optimal timing of treatment for errors in second language learning - A systematic review of corrective feedback timing.

Xu M, Zeng S Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1026174.

PMID: 36910773 PMC: 9995700. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1026174.

References
1.
Moret-Tatay C, Lemus-Zuniga L, Tortosa D, Gamermann D, Vazquez-Martinez A, Navarro-Pardo E . Age slowing down in detection and visual discrimination under varying presentation times. Scand J Psychol. 2017; 58(4):304-311. DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12372. View

2.
Li Y, Grabell A, Wakschlag L, Huppert T, Perlman S . The neural substrates of cognitive flexibility are related to individual differences in preschool irritability: A fNIRS investigation. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016; 25:138-144. PMC: 5292091. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2016.07.002. View

3.
Moret-Tatay C, Gamermann D, Navarro-Pardo E, Fernandez de Cordoba Castella P . ExGUtils: A Python Package for Statistical Analysis With the ex-Gaussian Probability Density. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:612. PMC: 5939052. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00612. View

4.
Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara G, Pastorelli C . Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Dev. 2001; 72(1):187-206. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00273. View

5.
Marmolejo-Ramos F, Cousineau D, Benites L, Maehara R . On the efficacy of procedures to normalize Ex-Gaussian distributions. Front Psychol. 2015; 5:1548. PMC: 4285694. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01548. View