» Articles » PMID: 35203942

Deprivation of Auditory Experience Influences Numerosity Discrimination, but Not Numerosity Estimation

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Feb 25
PMID 35203942
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Number sense is the ability to estimate the number of items, and it is common to many species. Despite the numerous studies dedicated to unveiling how numerosity is processed in the human brain, to date, it is not clear whether the representation of numerosity is supported by a single general mechanism or by multiple mechanisms. Since it is known that deafness entails a selective impairment in the processing of temporal information, we assessed the approximate numerical abilities of deaf individuals to disentangle these two hypotheses. We used a numerosity discrimination task (2AFC) and an estimation task, in both cases using sequential (temporal) or simultaneous (spatial) stimuli. The results showed a selective impairment of the deaf participants compared with the controls (hearing) in the temporal numerosity discrimination task, while no difference was found to discriminate spatial numerosity. Interestingly, the deaf and hearing participants did not differ in spatial or temporal numerosity estimation. Overall, our results suggest that the deficit in temporal processing induced by deafness also impacts perception in other domains such as numerosity, where sensory information is conveyed in a temporal format, which further suggests the existence of separate mechanisms subserving the processing of temporal and spatial numerosity.

Citing Articles

The role of non-numerical information in the perception of temporal numerosity.

Cicchini G, Anobile G, Burr D, Marchesini P, Arrighi R Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1197064.

PMID: 37588242 PMC: 10425770. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197064.


Temporal visual representation elicits early auditory-like responses in hearing but not in deaf individuals.

Gori M, Amadeo M, Pavani F, Valzolgher C, Campus C Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):19036.

PMID: 36351944 PMC: 9646881. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22224-x.

References
1.
Rodriguez-Santos J, Calleja M, Garcia-Orza J, Iza M, Damas J . Quantity processing in deaf and hard of hearing children: evidence from symbolic and nonsymbolic comparison tasks. Am Ann Deaf. 2014; 159(1):34-44. DOI: 10.1353/aad.2014.0015. View

2.
Walsh V . A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(11):483-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002. View

3.
DeWind N, Park J, Woldorff M, Brannon E . Numerical encoding in early visual cortex. Cortex. 2018; 114:76-89. PMC: 6170729. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.027. View

4.
Roggeman C, Santens S, Fias W, Verguts T . Stages of nonsymbolic number processing in occipitoparietal cortex disentangled by fMRI adaptation. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(19):7168-73. PMC: 6703200. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4503-10.2011. View

5.
Cattani A, Clibbens J, Perfect T . Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement. Neuropsychology. 2007; 21(1):114-21. DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.1.114. View