» Articles » PMID: 3519908

Noise Level Evaluation of Dental Handpieces

Overview
Journal J Oral Rehabil
Specialty Dentistry
Date 1986 May 1
PMID 3519908
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We evaluated the noise level of fourteen air-driven handpieces, six low speed (less than 20,000 rev/min) and eight high speed (greater than 160,000 rev/min), with respect to a three-directional co-ordinate system and distances of 6, 12 and 18 in. in each chosen direction. A two-way analysis of variance of the noise level between handpieces and positions indicates that large significant differences exist amongst handpieces and in different positions, and that interaction is just barely significant. The ranking and least significant differences for the mean of all handpieces v. position and for the mean of all positions v. handpiece were compared with the results for the ranking and significances from the one-way ANOVAS for each handpiece v. position and for each position v. handpiece. A trend exists with some of the handpieces of straight design (all low speed) for increased noise levels in a direction perpendicular to the handpieces and decreased levels in a direction parallel to the handpieces. For handpieces of angled design (all high speed) both directions parallel and perpendicular (the perpendicular to the longitudinal turbine axis) to the rotor axis indicate increased noise levels. The parallel direction includes the exiting air from the exhaust port. The perpendicular direction can be indicative of an aerodynamic factor associated with the established air flow patterns. The extremes in noise level were 56.8 dBA for a low-speed handpiece of straight design at the 18 in. distance in a direction parallel to the handpiece, and 87.3 dBA for a high speed handpiece at the 6 in. distance in a perpendicular direction.

Citing Articles

Noise levels encountered in university dental clinics during different specialty treatments.

Baseer M, Al Saffan A, AlMasoud S, Dahy W, Aldali H, Walid Bachat A J Family Med Prim Care. 2021; 10(8):2987-2992.

PMID: 34660436 PMC: 8483108. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_966_20.


Noise Disturbance and Potential Hearing Loss Due to Exposure of Dental Equipment in Flemish Dentists.

Dierickx M, Verschraegen S, Wierinck E, Willems G, van Wieringen A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(11).

PMID: 34074041 PMC: 8197294. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115617.


The effect of noise exposure on the vestibular systems of dental technicians.

Alqudah S Noise Health. 2020; 21(103):223-231.

PMID: 32978359 PMC: 7986451. DOI: 10.4103/nah.NAH_51_19.


Assessment of occupational noise-related hearing impairment among dental health personnel.

Al-Omoush S, Abdul-Baqi K, Zuriekat M, Alsoleihat F, Elmanaseer W, Jamani K J Occup Health. 2019; 62(1):e12093.

PMID: 31674128 PMC: 6970390. DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12093.


Prevalence of tinnitus and noise-induced hearing loss in dentists.

Myers J, John A, Kimball S, Fruits T Noise Health. 2016; 18(85):347-354.

PMID: 27991466 PMC: 5227015. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.195809.