» Articles » PMID: 35197042

Biomechanical Evaluation and Comparison of Clinically Relevant Versus Non-relevant Leg Length Inequalities

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2022 Feb 24
PMID 35197042
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Leg length inequalities are a frequent condition in every population. It is common clinical practice to consider LLIs of 2 cm and more as relevant and to treat those. However, the amount of LLIs that need treatment is not clearly defined in literature and the effect of real LLIs on the musculoskeletal system above and below 2 cm have not been studied biomechanically before.

Methods: By using surface topography, we evaluated 32 patients (10 females, 22 male) with real LLIs of ≥ 2 cm (mean: 2.72 cm; n = 10) and compared their pelvic position and spinal posture to patients with LLIs < 2 cm (mean: 1.24 cm; n = 22) while standing and walking. All patients were measured with a surface topography system during standing and while walking on a treadmill. To compare patient groups, we used Student t-tests for independent samples.

Results: Pelvic obliquity was significantly higher in patients with LLI ≥ 2 cm during the standing trial (p = 0.045) and during the midstance phase of the longer leg (p = 0.023) while walking. Further measurements did not reveal any significant differences (p = 0.06-0.706).

Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that relevant LLIs of ≥ 2 cm mostly affect pelvic obliquity and do not lead to significant alterations in the spinal posture during a standing trial. Additionally, we demonstrated that LLIs are better compensated when walking, showing almost no significant differences in pelvic and spinal posture between patients with LLIs smaller and greater than 2 cm. This study shows that LLIs ≥ 2 cm can still be compensated; however, we do not know if the compensation mechanisms may lead to long-term clinical pathologies.

Citing Articles

A systematic approach to managing complications after proximal tibial osteotomies of the knee.

Valcarenghi J, Vittone G, Mouton C, Coelho Leal A, Ibanez M, Hoffmann A J Exp Orthop. 2023; 10(1):131.

PMID: 38055158 PMC: 10700288. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00708-7.


No significant post-operative limb length difference following medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy in a multi-ethnic Southeast Asian population.

Betzler B, Saggi S, Liau M, Koh D, Lee K, Bin Abd Razak H J Exp Orthop. 2023; 10(1):89.

PMID: 37644360 PMC: 10465403. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-023-00654-4.

References
1.
Perttunen J, Anttila E, Sodergard J, Merikanto J, Komi P . Gait asymmetry in patients with limb length discrepancy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004; 14(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00307.x. View

2.
Krott N, Wild M, Betsch M . Meta-analysis of the validity and reliability of rasterstereographic measurements of spinal posture. Eur Spine J. 2020; 29(9):2392-2401. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06402-x. View

3.
Khamis S, Carmeli E . Relationship and significance of gait deviations associated with limb length discrepancy: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2017; 57:115-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.028. View

4.
Hasler C, Krieg A . Current concepts of leg lengthening. J Child Orthop. 2013; 6(2):89-104. PMC: 3364349. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0391-5. View

5.
Betsch M, Wild M, Grosse B, Rapp W, Horstmann T . The effect of simulating leg length inequality on spinal posture and pelvic position: a dynamic rasterstereographic analysis. Eur Spine J. 2011; 21(4):691-7. PMC: 3326121. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1912-5. View