» Articles » PMID: 35194927

Patient Preferences Using Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Four Victorian Tertiary Hospital Services

Overview
Journal Intern Med J
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Feb 23
PMID 35194927
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a major impact on healthcare services with many changes to telehealth care delivery. More information is needed about the patient perspective of telehealth in hospital services and the potential costs and benefits for patients.

Aim: To measure patients' evaluation of telehealth, preferences for telehealth versus in-person appointments, and potential cost savings by patient characteristics.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey (including patient and appointment characteristics, telehealth evaluation, preferences for care and costs) of adult patients using video telehealth in four metropolitan tertiary hospital services in Melbourne, Victoria.

Results: A total of 1045 patients (median age 44 years; interquartile range 29-59) participated with an overall response rate of 9.2%. For 98.7% patients, telehealth was convenient, 96.4% stated that it saved time, 95.9% found telehealth acceptable to receive care and 97.0% found that telehealth improved their access to care. Most (62.6%) preferred in-person consultations, although 86.9% agreed that telehealth was equivalent to an in-person consultation. Those in regional and rural areas were less likely to prefer in-person consultations. Patients attending for medical reasons were less likely to prefer in-person consultation compared with patients with surgical reasons. Patient preference to telehealth was independent of level of education, appointment type, self-rated health status and socio economic status. Patients saved an average of A$120.9 (standard deviation A$93.0) per appointment, with greater cost savings for patients from low and middle socio economic areas and regional or rural areas.

Conclusion: Telehealth video consultations were largely evaluated positively with most patients considering the service to be as good as in-person. Understanding patient preference is critical to consider when implementing telehealth as mainstream across hospital health services.

Citing Articles

Levels of Telehealth Use, Perceived Usefulness, and Ease of Use in Behavioral Healthcare Organizations After the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Fleddermann K, Chwastiak L, Fortier A, Gotham H, Murphy A, Navarro R J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024; 52(1):48-63.

PMID: 39110304 PMC: 11685243. DOI: 10.1007/s11414-024-09902-6.


Outpatient Video Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study of Patients' Experiences and Characteristics.

van den Bosch S, van Dalen D, Meinders M, Goor H, Berge S, Stommel M J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49058.

PMID: 38536236 PMC: 10977342. DOI: 10.2196/49058.


A Pilot Study to Evaluate a New Hep-GRP Care Pathway to Improve Outcomes Among Canadian Older Adults with Liver Cirrhosis.

Zhu J, Carr F, Sun M, Tian P, McLeod M, De Coutere S Can Geriatr J. 2024; 27(1):1-19.

PMID: 38433879 PMC: 10896207. DOI: 10.5770/cgj.27.725.


Advancing Virtual at-Home Care for Community Health Center Patients Using Patient Self-Care Tools, Technology, and Education.

Modica C, Lewis J, Bay R J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:521-531.

PMID: 38328633 PMC: 10849139. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S443973.


Patient and families' perspectives on telepalliative care: A systematic integrative review.

Bauer E, Schultz A, Brandt F, Smith A, Bollig G, Dieperink K Palliat Med. 2023; 38(1):42-56.

PMID: 38112009 PMC: 10865769. DOI: 10.1177/02692163231217146.


References
1.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

2.
Hiscock H, O Loughlin R, Pelly R, Laird C, Holman J, Dalziel K . Strengthening care for children: pilot of an integrated general practitioner-paediatrician model of primary care in Victoria, Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2020; 44(4):569-575. DOI: 10.1071/AH19177. View

3.
Ibrahim L, Huang L, Hopper S, Dalziel K, Babl F, Bryant P . Intravenous ceftriaxone at home versus intravenous flucloxacillin in hospital for children with cellulitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019; 19(10):1101-1108. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30288-9. View

4.
Doraiswamy S, Abraham A, Mamtani R, Cheema S . Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(12):e24087. PMC: 7710390. DOI: 10.2196/24087. View

5.
Brennan D, Mawson S, Brownsell S . Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009; 145:231-48. View