Slaughterhouse and Poultry Wastes: Management Practices, Feedstocks for Renewable Energy Production, and Recovery of Value Added Products

Overview

Journal Biomass Convers Biorefin

Publisher Springer

Date 2022 Feb 23

PMID 35194536

Authors

Velusamy Mozhiarasi

Thillai Sivakumar Natarajan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The slaughterhouse and poultry industry is possibly one of the fastest-growing sectors driven by the increasing demand in food availability. Subsequently, the wastes produced from the slaughterhouse and poultry industry are in huge quantities, which could be a promising resource for the recovery of value added products, and bioenergy production to minimize the dependence on fossil fuels. Furthermore, the wastes from slaughterhouses and poultry are a hub of pathogens that is capable of infecting humans and animals. This demands the emerging need for an effective and safe disposal method to reduce the spread of diseases following animal slaughtering. In light of that, the state of the production of slaughterhouse and poultry wastes was presented at first. Following this, the impact of solid waste exposure in terms of air, water, and soil pollution and the associated health challenges due to improper solid waste management practices were presented to highlight the importance of the topic. Secondly, the potency of these solid wastes and the various waste-to-energy technologies that have been employed for effective management and resource utilization of wastes generated from slaughterhouses and poultry were reviewed in detail. Finally, this review also highlights the opportunities and challenges associated with effective solid waste management, future requirements for the development of effective technologies for the recovery of value added products (like keratin, fibreboards), and biofuel production.

Citing Articles

Integrated environmental and health economic assessments of novel xeno-keratografts addressing a growing public health crisis.

Ali M, Corridon P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25600.

PMID: 39465317 PMC: 11514208. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77783-y.

The Growth Performance and Nutrient Composition of Black Soldier Fly () Larvae Fed Slaughtered Bovine Blood.

Bian H, Qiao Y, Li Y, Wang Z, Zhao L, Li Z Insects. 2024; 15(9).

PMID: 39336603 PMC: 11432165. DOI: 10.3390/insects15090635.

Recent Advances in Bio-Based Adhesives and Formaldehyde-Free Technologies for Wood-Based Panel Manufacturing.

Calvez I, Garcia R, Koubaa A, Landry V, Cloutier A Curr For Rep. 2024; 10(5):386-400.

PMID: 39301227 PMC: 11408402. DOI: 10.1007/s40725-024-00227-3.

Find alternative for bovine and porcine gelatin: Study on physicochemical, rheological properties and water-holding capacity of chicken lungs gelatin by ultrasound treatment.

Zou Y, Chen X, Lan Y, Yang J, Yang B, Ma J Ultrason Sonochem. 2024; 109:107004.

PMID: 39094266 PMC: 11345400. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.107004.

Region-Specific Decellularization of Porcine Uterine Tube Extracellular Matrix: A New Approach for Reproductive Tissue-Engineering Applications.

Almeida G, da Silva R, Gibin M, Gonzaga V, Dos Santos H, Igleisa R Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(7).

PMID: 39056823 PMC: 11274565. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9070382.

References

Ben Hassen-Trabelsi A, Kraiem T, Naoui S, Belayouni H . Pyrolysis of waste animal fats in a fixed-bed reactor: production and characterization of bio-oil and bio-char. Waste Manag. 2013; 34(1):210-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.09.019. View

Safaric R, Zemljic L, Novak M, Dugonik B, Bratina B, Gubeljak N . Preparation and Characterisation of Waste Poultry Feathers Composite Fibreboards. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(21). PMC: 7663731. DOI: 10.3390/ma13214964. View

Joseph A, Snellings R, Van den Heede P, Matthys S, De Belie N . The Use of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Ash in Various Building Materials: A Belgian Point of View. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11(1). PMC: 5793639. DOI: 10.3390/ma11010141. View

Su J, Chou Y . Biodiesel Production by Acid Methanolysis of Slaughterhouse Sludge Cake. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(12). PMC: 6940772. DOI: 10.3390/ani9121029. View

Oshita K, Sun X, Taniguchi M, Takaoka M, Matsukawa K, Fujiwara T . Emission of greenhouse gases from controlled incineration of cattle manure. Environ Technol. 2012; 33(13-15):1539-44. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2012.683818. View

Riedel S, Jahns S, Koenig S, Bock M, Brigham C, Bader J . Polyhydroxyalkanoates production with Ralstonia eutropha from low quality waste animal fats. J Biotechnol. 2015; 214:119-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.09.002. View

Cabral J . Water microbiology. Bacterial pathogens and water. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7(10):3657-703. PMC: 2996186. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph7103657. View

Bayr S, Rantanen M, Kaparaju P, Rintala J . Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of rendering plant and slaughterhouse wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 104:28-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.104. View

Goud T, Upadhyay R, Kumar A, Karri S, Choudhary R, Ashraf S . Novel extraction of high quality genomic DNA from frozen bovine blood samples by using detergent method. Open Vet J. 2018; 8(4):415-422. PMC: 6243206. DOI: 10.4314/ovj.v8i4.11. View

10.

Ngoc U, Schnitzer H . Sustainable solutions for solid waste management in Southeast Asian countries. Waste Manag. 2009; 29(6):1982-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.031. View

11.

Kim H, Han S, Song E, Park S . Estimation of the characteristics with hydrothermal carbonisation temperature on poultry slaughterhouse wastes. Waste Manag Res. 2018; 36(6):535-540. DOI: 10.1177/0734242X18772085. View

12.

Dhar H, Kumar P, Kumar S, Mukherjee S, Vaidya A . Effect of organic loading rate during anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Bioresour Technol. 2016; 217:56-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.004. View

13.

Narayana T . Municipal solid waste management in India: From waste disposal to recovery of resources?. Waste Manag. 2008; 29(3):1163-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.038. View

14.

Ferronato N, Torretta V . Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(6). PMC: 6466021. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16061060. View

15.

Phua Z, Giannis A, Dong Z, Lisak G, Ng W . Characteristics of incineration ash for sustainable treatment and reutilization. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019; 26(17):16974-16997. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05217-8. View

16.

Kondamudi N, Strull J, Misra M, Mohapatra S . A green process for producing biodiesel from feather meal. J Agric Food Chem. 2009; 57(14):6163-6. DOI: 10.1021/jf900140e. View

17.

Almomani F, Bhosale R . Enhancing the production of biogas through anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural waste and chemical pre-treatments. Chemosphere. 2020; 255:126805. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126805. View

18.

Zwetsloot M, Lehmann J, Solomon D . Recycling slaughterhouse waste into fertilizer: how do pyrolysis temperature and biomass additions affect phosphorus availability and chemistry?. J Sci Food Agric. 2014; 95(2):281-8. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6716. View

19.

Zhang C, Wang F, Pei M, Qiu L, Qiang H, Yao Y . Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(12). PMC: 6617338. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16122239. View

20.

Lynch S, Mullen A, ONeill E, Alvarez Garcia C . Harnessing the Potential of Blood Proteins as Functional Ingredients: A Review of the State of the Art in Blood Processing. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020; 16(2):330-344. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12254. View