» Articles » PMID: 35193755

Variation Across Centers in Standardized Mortality Ratios for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Receiving Extracorporeal Life Support

Overview
Journal J Pediatr Surg
Date 2022 Feb 23
PMID 35193755
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We sought to elucidate the degree of variation across centers by calculating center-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) requiring extracorporeal life support (ECLS).

Methods: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry data (2000-2019) were used to estimate SMRs. Center-specific SMRs and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to identify centers with mortality as significantly worse (SW), significantly better (SB), or not different (ND) relative to the median standardized mortality rate.

Results: We identified 4,223 neonates with CDH from 109 centers. SMRs were risk-adjusted for pre-ECLS case-mix (birthweight, sex, race, 5 min Apgar, blood gases, gestational age, hernia side, prenatal diagnosis, pre-ECLS arrest, and comorbidities). Observed (unadjusted) mortality rates across centers varied substantially (range: 14.3%-90.9%; interquartile range [IQR]: 42.9%-62.1%). Thirteen centers (11.9%) had SB SMRs< 1 (SMR 0.52 to 0.84), 7 centers (6.4%) had SW SMRs>1 (SMR 1.25 to 1.43), and 89 centers (81.7%) had SMRs ND relative to the median SMR rate across all centers (i.e., SMR not different from one). Descriptive analyses demonstrated that SB centers had a lower proportion of cases with renal complications, infectious complications and discontinuation of ECLS owing to complications, as well as differences in pre-ECLS treatments and timing of CDH repair, compared to SW and ND centers.

Conclusion: This study specifically identified ECLS centers with higher and lower survival for patients with CDH, which may serve as a benchmark for institutional quality improvement. Future studies are needed to identify those specific processes at those centers that leads to favorable outcomes with the goal of improving care globally.

Level Of Evidence: Level III.

Citing Articles

Enhancing the Survival of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Quality Improvement Initiative With a Multidisciplinary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Team Approach.

Lee B, Jung E, Kim H, Kim S, Jeong J, Lee H J Korean Med Sci. 2024; 39(48):e300.

PMID: 39688328 PMC: 11650333. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e300.


Could a Two-Staged Repair Be the Solution to the Dilemma of Repair Timing for Severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?.

Yokoi A Children (Basel). 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39457220 PMC: 11506477. DOI: 10.3390/children11101255.


Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and cleft lip and palate: looking for a common genetic etiology.

Nord P, Ebanks A, Peterson P, Iwarsson E, Harting M, Mesas Burgos C Pediatr Surg Int. 2024; 40(1):259.

PMID: 39352580 PMC: 11445286. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05843-5.


The role of extracorporeal life support and timing of repair in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Gehle D, Meyer L, Jancelewicz T World J Pediatr Surg. 2024; 7(2):e000752.

PMID: 38645885 PMC: 11029407. DOI: 10.1136/wjps-2023-000752.


Organization of care of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia-Building a high-functioning CDH program.

Fernandes C, Gautham K J Perinatol. 2023; 44(3):339-347.

PMID: 37798339 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-023-01789-z.