» Articles » PMID: 35193420

Feature-specific Retrieval of the Knowledge of Having Lied Before: Persons and Questions Independently Retrieve Truth-related Information

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2022 Feb 23
PMID 35193420
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research on event coding has shown that, by default, bindings are binary and elemental, that is, individual objects or single features of these objects can retrieve responses separately and independently. In our study, we applied these findings to the automatic retrieval of former deceptions. Specifically, we investigated whether the person or the question to which one has answered deceptively can retrieve this knowledge independently, or whether there is also evidence for configural retrieval processes that use a combination of person and question information to retrieve the truth status of former episodes. We found evidence for retrieval based on single cues (i.e., person or question), supporting that the elementary retrieval of episodes by independent cues also holds in the context of retrieving knowledge about former lies.

Citing Articles

Being in the Know: The Role of Awareness and Retrieval of Transient Stimulus-Response Bindings in Selective Contingency Learning.

Arunkumar M, Rothermund K, Kunde W, Giesen C J Cogn. 2022; 5(1):36.

PMID: 36072091 PMC: 9400625. DOI: 10.5334/joc.227.

References
1.
Waszak F, Hommel B, Allport A . Task-switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cogn Psychol. 2003; 46(4):361-413. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00520-0. View

2.
Moeller B, Frings C, Pfister R . The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015; 42(4):464-79. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000158. View

3.
Giesen C, Schmidt J, Rothermund K . The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition. Front Psychol. 2020; 10:2927. PMC: 6974578. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927. View

4.
Eder A, Rothermund K . When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008; 137(2):262-81. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262. View

5.
Schmidt J, De Houwer J, Rothermund K . The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model 2.0: A single computational model of stimulus-response binding, contingency learning, power curves, and mixing costs. Cogn Psychol. 2016; 91:82-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.10.004. View