» Articles » PMID: 35192000

Reinforced Education by Short Message Service Improves the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy

Overview
Date 2022 Feb 22
PMID 35192000
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of reinforced education (RE) by short message service (SMS) on the bowel preparation quality of patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), conducted on the effect of RE by SMS on bowel preparation for colonoscopy from inception to November 1, 2021, were queried from databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. After extracting the data, meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Software version 5.3.

Results: A total of seven RCTs with 5889 patients were subjected to meta-analysis. The rate of adequate bowel preparation in the SMS group (81.7%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (75.7%) (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03-1.17, p < 0.01). Four studies suggested that RE by SMS significantly reduced the non-attendance rate of patients for scheduled colonoscopy (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.99, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: RE by SMS for patients undergoing colonoscopy can significantly improve the quality of bowel preparation and decrease the non-attendance rate of patients for scheduled colonoscopy.

Citing Articles

Development and validation of a novel scoring system based on a nomogram for predicting inadequate bowel preparation.

Zhao X, Pan Y, Hao J, Feng J, Cui Z, Ma H Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; 26(9):2262-2273.

PMID: 38565812 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03443-2.


Enhancing bowel preparation quality and tolerability in a low health literacy population in Western China: a multicenter randomized trial.

Zhao X, Yang L, Hu X, Kong G, Huang X J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023; 149(20):17957-17971.

PMID: 37968520 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05493-5.


Effect of Visual Booklets to Improve Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Losurdo G, Martino M, De Bellis M, Celiberto F, Rizzi S, Principi M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37445412 PMC: 10342745. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134377.

References
1.
Ladabaum U, Dominitz J, Kahi C, Schoen R . Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology. 2019; 158(2):418-432. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.043. View

2.
Sharma P, Burke C, Johnson D, Cash B . The importance of colonoscopy bowel preparation for the detection of colorectal lesions and colorectal cancer prevention. Endosc Int Open. 2020; 8(5):E673-E683. PMC: 7165013. DOI: 10.1055/a-1127-3144. View

3.
Millien V, Mansour N . Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020; 22(6):28. DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4. View

4.
Kutyla M, OConnor S, Hourigan L, Kendall B, Whaley A, Meeusen V . An Evidence-based Approach Towards Targeted Patient Education to Improve Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019; 54(8):707-713. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001286. View

5.
Johnson D, Barkun A, Cohen L, Dominitz J, Kaltenbach T, Martel M . Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014; 147(4):903-24. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002. View