» Articles » PMID: 35189334

Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Clinical Trial Planning by Assessing Eligibility Criteria's Impact on Patient Count and Safety

Overview
Journal J Biomed Inform
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2022 Feb 21
PMID 35189334
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To present an approach on using electronic health record (EHR) data that assesses how different eligibility criteria, either individually or in combination, can impact patient count and safety (exemplified by all-cause hospitalization risk) and further assist with criteria selection for prospective clinical trials.

Materials And Methods: Trials in three disease domains - relapsed/refractory (r/r) lymphoma/leukemia; hepatitis C virus (HCV); stages 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) - were analyzed as case studies for this approach. For each disease domain, criteria were identified and all criteria combinations were used to create EHR cohorts. Per combination, two values were derived: (1) number of eligible patients meeting the selected criteria; (2) hospitalization risk, measured as the hazard ratio between those that qualified and those that did not. From these values, k-means clustering was applied to derive which criteria combinations maximized patient counts but minimized hospitalization risk.

Results: Criteria combinations that reduced hospitalization risk without substantial reductions on patient counts were as follows: for r/r lymphoma/leukemia (23 trials; 9 criteria; 623 patients), applying no infection and adequate absolute neutrophil count while forgoing no prior malignancy; for HCV (15; 7; 751), applying no human immunodeficiency virus and no hepatocellular carcinoma while forgoing no decompensated liver disease/cirrhosis; for CKD (10; 9; 23893), applying no congestive heart failure.

Conclusions: Within each disease domain, the more drastic effects were generally driven by a few criteria. Similar criteria across different disease domains introduce different changes. Although results are contingent on the trial sample and the EHR data used, this approach demonstrates how EHR data can inform the impact on safety and available patients when exploring different criteria combinations for designing clinical trials.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the robustness of an AI pathfinder application on eligibility criteria in multiple myeloma trials using real-world data and historical trials.

Jreich R, Zhang H, Meng Z, Wang F J Comp Eff Res. 2024; 13(7):e230164.

PMID: 38869838 PMC: 11225521. DOI: 10.57264/cer-2023-0164.


Impacts of Eligibility Criteria on Trial Participants' Age in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials.

Chen A, Li Q, He X, Jaffee M, Hogan W, Wang F AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2023; 2022:368-376.

PMID: 37128470 PMC: 10148327.

References
1.
Varettoni M, Tedeschi A, Arcaini L, Pascutto C, Vismara E, Orlandi E . Risk of second cancers in Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Ann Oncol. 2011; 23(2):411-5. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr119. View

2.
Herrera A, Snipes S, King D, Torres-Vigil I, Goldberg D, Weinberg A . Disparate inclusion of older adults in clinical trials: priorities and opportunities for policy and practice change. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100 Suppl 1:S105-12. PMC: 2837461. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162982. View

3.
Malik L, Lu D . Eligibility criteria for phase I clinical trials: tight vs loose?. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019; 83(5):999-1002. DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03801-w. View

4.
Evans S, Paraoan D, Perlmutter J, Raman S, Sheehan J, Hallinan Z . Real-World Data for Planning Eligibility Criteria and Enhancing Recruitment: Recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021; 55(3):545-552. PMC: 8021522. DOI: 10.1007/s43441-020-00248-7. View

5.
Roger V . Epidemiology of heart failure. Circ Res. 2013; 113(6):646-59. PMC: 3806290. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300268. View