» Articles » PMID: 35187094

Visual Haptic Feedback for Training of Robotic Suturing

Overview
Journal Front Robot AI
Date 2022 Feb 21
PMID 35187094
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current surgical robotic systems are teleoperated and do not have force feedback. Considerable practice is required to learn how to use visual input such as tissue deformation upon contact as a substitute for tactile sense. Thus, unnecessarily high forces are observed in novices, prior to specific robotic training, and visual force feedback studies demonstrated reduction of applied forces. Simulation exercises with realistic suturing tasks can provide training outside the operating room. This paper presents contributions to realistic interactive suture simulation for training of suturing and knot-tying tasks commonly used in robotically-assisted surgery. To improve the realism of the simulation, we developed a global coordinate wire model with a new constraint development for the elongation. We demonstrated that a continuous modeling of the contacts avoids instabilities during knot tightening. Visual cues are additionally provided, based on the computation of mechanical forces or constraints, to support learning how to dose the forces. The results are integrated into a powerful system-agnostic simulator, and the comparison with equivalent tasks performed with the da Vinci Xi system confirms its realism.

Citing Articles

Augmenting visual feedback with visualized interaction forces in haptic-assisted virtual-reality teleoperation.

van den Berg A, Hofland J, Heemskerk C, Abbink D, Peternel L Front Robot AI. 2025; 11:1427095.

PMID: 39744461 PMC: 11688239. DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1427095.


Skill progress during a dedicated societal robotic surgery training curriculum including several robotic surgery platforms.

Seeliger B, Pavone M, Schroder W, Kruger C, Bruns C, Scambia G Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(9):5405-5412.

PMID: 39107481 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11128-8.


Current advancements in therapeutic approaches in orthopedic surgery: a review of recent trends.

Liang W, Zhou C, Bai J, Zhang H, Jiang B, Wang J Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1328997.

PMID: 38405378 PMC: 10884185. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1328997.


Surgical stress: the muscle and cognitive demands of robotic and laparoscopic surgery.

Shugaba A, Subar D, Slade K, Willett M, Abdel-Aty M, Campbell I Ann Surg Open. 2023; 4(2):e284.

PMID: 37342254 PMC: 7614670. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000284.


Basic performance of domestic surgical robot and the safety and effectiveness of integrated energy equipment.

Song Z, Wang G, Zhu L, Yi B, Li P, Zhu S Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023; 48(2):221-230.

PMID: 36999469 PMC: 10930343. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.220053.

References
1.
Basdogan C, De S, Kim J, Muniyandi M, Kim H, Srinivasan M . Haptics in minimally invasive surgical simulation and training. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2004; 24(2):56-64. DOI: 10.1109/mcg.2004.1274062. View

2.
Qi D, Panneerselvam K, Ahn W, Arikatla V, Enquobahrie A, De S . Virtual interactive suturing for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). J Biomed Inform. 2017; 75:48-62. PMC: 5685933. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.09.010. View

3.
Husken N, Schuppe O, Sismanidis E, Beier F . MicroSim - a microsurgical training simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013; 184:205-9. View

4.
Xu L, Liu Q . Real-time inextensible surgical thread simulation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018; 13(7):1019-1035. PMC: 6015127. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1739-1. View

5.
Doarn C, Anvari M, Low T, Broderick T . Evaluation of teleoperated surgical robots in an enclosed undersea environment. Telemed J E Health. 2009; 15(4):325-35. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2008.0123. View