» Articles » PMID: 35185502

Reinforcement Learning Model With Dynamic State Space Tested on Target Search Tasks for Monkeys: Self-Determination of Previous States Based on Experience Saturation and Decision Uniqueness

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Feb 21
PMID 35185502
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The real world is essentially an indefinite environment in which the probability space, i. e., what can happen, cannot be specified in advance. Conventional reinforcement learning models that learn under uncertain conditions are given the state space as prior knowledge. Here, we developed a reinforcement learning model with a dynamic state space and tested it on a two-target search task previously used for monkeys. In the task, two out of four neighboring spots were alternately correct, and the valid pair was switched after consecutive correct trials in the exploitation phase. The agent was required to find a new pair during the exploration phase, but it could not obtain the maximum reward by referring only to the single previous one trial; it needed to select an action based on the two previous trials. To adapt to this task structure without prior knowledge, the model expanded its state space so that it referred to more than one trial as the previous state, based on two explicit criteria for appropriateness of state expansion: experience saturation and decision uniqueness of action selection. The model not only performed comparably to the ideal model given prior knowledge of the task structure, but also performed well on a task that was not envisioned when the models were developed. Moreover, it learned how to search rationally without falling into the exploration-exploitation trade-off. For constructing a learning model that can adapt to an indefinite environment, the method of expanding the state space based on experience saturation and decision uniqueness of action selection used by our model is promising.

Citing Articles

Reinforcement Learning Model With Dynamic State Space Tested on Target Search Tasks for Monkeys: Extension to Learning Task Events.

Sakamoto K, Yamada H, Kawaguchi N, Furusawa Y, Saito N, Mushiake H Front Comput Neurosci. 2022; 16:784604.

PMID: 35720772 PMC: 9201426. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2022.784604.

References
1.
Shima K, Tanji J . Role for cingulate motor area cells in voluntary movement selection based on reward. Science. 1998; 282(5392):1335-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5392.1335. View

2.
Mushiake H, Saito N, Sakamoto K, Sato Y, Tanji J . Visually based path-planning by Japanese monkeys. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001; 11(1):165-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(00)00067-7. View

3.
Friston K . The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010; 11(2):127-38. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2787. View

4.
Rescorla R, Solomon R . Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychol Rev. 1967; 74(3):151-82. DOI: 10.1037/h0024475. View

5.
Sakamoto K, Saito N, Yoshida S, Mushiake H . Dynamic Axis-Tuned Cells in the Monkey Lateral Prefrontal Cortex during a Path-Planning Task. J Neurosci. 2019; 40(1):203-219. PMC: 6939495. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2526-18.2019. View