» Articles » PMID: 35180010

Addition of Navitoclax to Ongoing Ruxolitinib Therapy for Patients With Myelofibrosis With Progression or Suboptimal Response: Phase II Safety and Efficacy

Abstract

Purpose: Targeting the BCL-X pathway has demonstrated the ability to overcome Janus kinase inhibitor resistance in preclinical models. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of adding BCL-X/BCL-2 inhibitor navitoclax to ruxolitinib therapy in patients with myelofibrosis with progression or suboptimal response to ruxolitinib monotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222609).

Methods: Thirty-four adult patients with intermediate-/high-risk myelofibrosis who had progression or suboptimal response on stable ruxolitinib dose (≥ 10 mg twice daily) were administered navitoclax at 50 mg once daily starting dose, followed by escalation to a maximum of 300 mg once daily in once in weekly increments (if platelets were ≥ 75 × 10/L). The primary end point was ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR) from baseline at week 24. Secondary end points included ≥ 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS) from baseline at week 24, hemoglobin improvement, change in bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) grade, and safety.

Results: High molecular risk mutations were identified in 58% of patients, and 52% harbored ≥ 3 mutations. SVR was achieved by 26.5% of patients at week 24, and by 41%, at any time on study, with an estimated median duration of SVR of 13.8 months. TSS was achieved by 30% (6 of 20) of patients at week 24, and BMF improved by 1-2 grades in 33% (11 of 33) of evaluable patients. Anemia response was achieved by 64% (7 of 11), including one patient with baseline transfusion dependence. Median overall survival was not reached with a median follow-up of 21.6 months. The most common adverse event was reversible thrombocytopenia without clinically significant bleeding (88%).

Conclusion: The addition of navitoclax to ruxolitinib in patients with persistent or progressive myelofibrosis resulted in durable SVR, improved TSS, hemoglobin response, and BMF. Further investigation is underway to qualify the potential for disease modification.

Citing Articles

Model-Assisted Spleen Contouring for Assessing Splenomegaly in Myelofibrosis: A Fast and Reproducible Approach to Evaluate Progression and Treatment Response.

Sharbatdaran A, Cohen T, Dev H, Sattar U, Bazojoo V, Wang Y J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860449 PMC: 11766003. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020443.


Navitoclax safety, tolerability, and effect on biomarkers of senescence and neurodegeneration in aged nonhuman primates.

Greenberg E, Voorbach M, Smith A, Reuter D, Zhuang Y, Wang J Heliyon. 2024; 10(16):e36483.

PMID: 39253182 PMC: 11382177. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36483.


Advances in Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis.

Rajendra A, Gupta V Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2024; 19(6):256-263.

PMID: 39240494 DOI: 10.1007/s11899-024-00742-x.


Liver and spleen shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis and severity staging of myeloproliferative diseases and myelofibrosis.

Sansone V, Auteri G, Tovoli F, Mazzoni C, Paglia S, Di Pietro C J Ultrasound. 2024; 27(3):715-722.

PMID: 39060716 PMC: 11333402. DOI: 10.1007/s40477-024-00932-6.


Cellular senescence in metastatic prostate cancer: A therapeutic opportunity or challenge (Review).

Jin C, Liao S, Lu G, Geng B, Ye Z, Xu J Mol Med Rep. 2024; 30(3).

PMID: 38994760 PMC: 11258599. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2024.13286.


References
1.
Pikman Y, Lee B, Mercher T, McDowell E, Ebert B, Gozo M . MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. PLoS Med. 2006; 3(7):e270. PMC: 1502153. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030270. View

2.
Wernig G, Mercher T, Okabe R, Levine R, Lee B, Gilliland D . Expression of Jak2V617F causes a polycythemia vera-like disease with associated myelofibrosis in a murine bone marrow transplant model. Blood. 2006; 107(11):4274-81. PMC: 1895786. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-4824. View

3.
Palandri F, Breccia M, Bonifacio M, Polverelli N, Elli E, Benevolo G . Life after ruxolitinib: Reasons for discontinuation, impact of disease phase, and outcomes in 218 patients with myelofibrosis. Cancer. 2019; 126(6):1243-1252. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32664. View

4.
Newberry K, Patel K, Masarova L, Luthra R, Manshouri T, Jabbour E . Clonal evolution and outcomes in myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib discontinuation. Blood. 2017; 130(9):1125-1131. PMC: 5580275. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-783225. View

5.
Zhong X, Lim E, Hershman D, Moinpour C, Unger J, Lee S . Identifying Severe Adverse Event Clusters Using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. J Oncol Pract. 2016; 12(3):e270-80, 245-6. PMC: 5702793. DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006106. View