How Does Intraoperative Fracture Malalignment Affect Postoperative Function and Bone Healing Following Distal Femoral Fracture? : a Retrospective Multicentre Study

Overview

Journal Bone Jt Open

Date 2022 Feb 18

PMID 35176869

Authors

Yutaro Kuwahara

Yasuhiko Takegami

Katsuhiro Tokutake

Yotaro Yamada

Kentaro Komaki

Tsunenobu Ichikawa

Shiro Imagama

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims: Postoperative malalignment of the femur is one of the main complications in distal femur fractures. Few papers have investigated the impact of intraoperative malalignment on postoperative function and bone healing outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate how intraoperative fracture malalignment affects postoperative bone healing and functional outcomes.

Methods: In total, 140 patients were retrospectively identified from data obtained from a database of hospitals participating in a trauma research group. We divided them into two groups according to coronal plane malalignment of more than 5°: 108 had satisfactory fracture alignment (< 5°, group S), and 32 had unsatisfactory alignment (> 5°, group U). Patient characteristics and injury-related factors were recorded. We compared the rates of nonunion, implant failure, and reoperation as healing outcomes and Knee Society Score (KSS) at three, six, and 12 months as functional outcomes. We also performed a sub-analysis to assess the effect of fracture malalignment by plates and nails on postoperative outcomes.

Results: The rates of nonunion and reoperation in group U were worse than those in group S (25.0% vs 14.3%; 15.6% vs 5.6%), but the differences were not significant (p = 0.180 and p = 0.126, respectively). Mean KSS in group U at all follow-up periods was significantly worse that in group S (75.7 (SD 18.8) vs 86.0 (SD 8.7); p < 0.001; 78.9 (SD 17.2) vs 89.1 (SD 9.8); p < 0.001; 85.0 (SD 11.9) vs 91.1 (SD 7.2); p = 0.002, respectively). In the sub-analysis of plates, mean KSS was significantly worse in group U at three and six months. In the sub-analysis of nails, the rate of reoperation was significantly higher in group U (28.6% vs 5.8%; p = 0.025), and mean KSS at six and 12 months was significantly worse in Group U.

Conclusion: To obtain good postoperative functional results, intraoperative alignment of the coronal plane should be accurately restored to less than 5°. Cite this article: 2022;3(2):165-172.

Citing Articles

Mechanism research of elastic fixation promoting fracture healing based on proteomics and fracture microenvironment.

Wu W, Zhao Z, Wang Y, Liu M, Zhu G, Li L Bone Joint Res. 2024; 13(10):559-572.

PMID: 39377775 PMC: 11460404. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.1310.BJR-2023-0257.R2.

Risk of reverse golf club deformity with medial plating of distal femur fracture.

Thorne T, DeKeyser G, Clapp I, Haller J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(3):1211-1220.

PMID: 38265463 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05173-6.

Using a Traction Table for Fracture Reduction during Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) of Distal Femoral Fractures Provides Anatomical Alignment.

Paulsson M, Ekholm C, Tranberg R, Rolfson O, Geijer M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(12).

PMID: 37373737 PMC: 10299435. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124044.

The double-plate fixation technique prevents varus collapse in AO type C3 supra-intercondylar fracture of the distal femur.

Liu C, Tsai P, Chen I, Yu Y, Chou Y, Hsu Y Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(10):6209-6217.

PMID: 37347253 PMC: 10491700. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04953-4.

References

Marsh D . Concepts of fracture union, delayed union, and nonunion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (355 Suppl):S22-30. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00004. View

Neer 2nd C, GRANTHAM S, SHELTON M . Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. A study of one hundred and ten cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967; 49(4):591-613. View

Barei D, Beingessner D . Open distal femur fractures treated with lateral locked implants: union, secondary bone grafting, and predictive parameters. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(6):e843-6. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120525-22. View

Kim J, Oh C, Oh J, Park I, Kyung H, Park K . Malalignment after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal femoral fractures. Injury. 2017; 48(3):751-757. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.019. View

Kolmert L, Wulff K . Epidemiology and treatment of distal femoral fractures in adults. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982; 53(6):957-62. DOI: 10.3109/17453678208992855. View

Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, Scott W . Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248):13-4. View

Einhorn T, Gerstenfeld L . Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014; 11(1):45-54. PMC: 4464690. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.164. View

Du Y, Ma J, Wang S, Sun L, Wang Y, Lu B . Comparison of Less Invasive Stabilization System Plate and Retrograde Intramedullary Nail in the Fixation of Femoral Supracondylar Fractures in the Elderly: A Biomechanical Study. Orthop Surg. 2019; 11(2):311-317. PMC: 6594534. DOI: 10.1111/os.12449. View

Scott B, Wright R, Moghadamian E . Intraoperative Assessment of Coronal Alignment in Distal Femur Fracture Fixation: Technical Trick. J Orthop Trauma. 2018; 33(2):e69-e72. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001334. View

10.

von Keudell A, Shoji K, Nasr M, Lucas R, Dolan R, Weaver M . Treatment Options for Distal Femur Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016; 30 Suppl 2:S25-7. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000621. View

11.

Fitz-Henry J . The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011; 93(3):185-7. PMC: 3348554. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2011.93.3.185a. View

12.

Gill S, Mittal A, Raj M, Singh P, Singh J, Kumar S . Extra Articular Supracondylar Femur Fractures Managed with Locked Distal Femoral Plate or Supracondylar Nailing: A Comparative Outcome Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017; 11(5):RC19-RC23. PMC: 5483764. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25062.9936. View

13.

Charlson M, Szatrowski T, Peterson J, Gold J . Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994; 47(11):1245-51. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5. View

14.

Rodriguez E, Boulton C, Weaver M, Herder L, Morgan J, Chacko A . Predictive factors of distal femoral fracture nonunion after lateral locked plating: a retrospective multicenter case-control study of 283 fractures. Injury. 2013; 45(3):554-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.042. View

15.

Wahnert D, Hoffmeier K, Frober R, Hofmann G, Muckley T . Distal femur fractures of the elderly--different treatment options in a biomechanical comparison. Injury. 2010; 42(7):655-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.009. View

16.

Gao K, Gao W, Huang J, Li H, Li F, Tao J . Retrograde nailing versus locked plating of extra-articular distal femoral fractures: comparison of 36 cases. Med Princ Pract. 2012; 22(2):161-6. PMC: 5586724. DOI: 10.1159/000342664. View

17.

Hoskins W, Sheehy R, Edwards E, Hau R, Bucknill A, Parsons N . Nails or plates for fracture of the distal femur? data from the Victoria Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(6):846-50. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36826. View

18.

Smith J, Halliday R, Aquilina A, Morrison R, Yip G, McArthur J . Distal femoral fractures: The need to review the standard of care. Injury. 2015; 46(6):1084-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.016. View

19.

Zehntner M, Marchesi D, Burch H, Ganz R . Alignment of supracondylar/intercondylar fractures of the femur after internal fixation by AO/ASIF technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1992; 6(3):318-26. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199209000-00009. View

20.

Meinberg E, Agel J, Roberts C, Karam M, Kellam J . Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 32 Suppl 1:S1-S170. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063. View