Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds As Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression

Overview

Journal J Am Acad Audiol

Publisher Thieme

Specialty Otorhinolaryngology

Date 2022 Feb 17

PMID 35176803

Authors

Marc A Brennan

Ryan W McCreery

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Nonlinear frequency compression (NFC) lowers high-frequency sounds to a lower frequency and is used to improve high-frequency audibility. However, the efficacy of NFC varies widely-while some individuals benefit from NFC, many do not. Spectral resolution is one factor that might explain individual benefit from NFC. Because individuals with better spectral resolution understand more speech than those with poorer spectral resolution, it was hypothesized that individual benefit from NFC could be predicted from the change in spectral resolution measured with NFC relative to a condition without NFC.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the impact of NFC on access to spectral information and whether these changes predict individual benefit from NFC for adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

Research Design: Present study is a quasi-experimental cohort study. Participants used a pair of hearing aids set to the Desired Sensation Level algorithm (DSL m[i/o]).

Study Sample: Participants were 19 adults with SNHL, recruited from the Boys Town National Research Hospital Participant Registry.

Data Collection And Analysis: Participants were seated in a sound-attenuating booth and then percent-correct recognition of words, and spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds were measured for two different conditions, with and without NFC. Because audibility is known to influence spectral-ripple thresholds and benefit from NFC, audibility was quantified using the aided speech intelligibility index (SII). Linear mixed models were generated to predict word recognition using the aided SII and spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds.

Results: While NFC did not influence percent-correct word recognition, participants with higher (better) aided SII and spectral-ripple discrimination thresholds understood more words than those with either a lower aided SII or spectral-ripple discrimination threshold. Benefit from NFC was not predictable from a participant's aided SII or spectral-ripple discrimination threshold.

Conclusion: We have extended previous work on the effect of audibility on benefit from NFC to include a measure of spectral resolution, the spectral-ripple discrimination threshold. Clinically, these results suggest that patients with better audibility and spectral resolution will understand speech better than those with poorer audibility or spectral resolution; however, these results are inconsistent with the notion that individual benefit from NFC is predictable from aided audibility or spectral resolution.

References

Agrawal Y, Platz E, Niparko J . Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168(14):1522-30. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.14.1522. View

Brennan M, Lewis D, McCreery R, Kopun J, Alexander J . Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2017; 28(9):823-837. PMC: 5634744. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16158. View

Shehorn J, Marrone N, Muller T . Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids. Ear Hear. 2017; 39(2):215-225. PMC: 5809244. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000481. View

Ellis R, Munro K . Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol. 2014; 54(1):37-47. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.948217. View

Scollie S, Seewald R, Cornelisse L, Moodie S, Bagatto M, Laurnagaray D . The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif. 2006; 9(4):159-97. PMC: 4111494. DOI: 10.1177/108471380500900403. View

Brennan M, McCreery R, Kopun J, Lewis D, Alexander J, Stelmachowicz P . Masking Release in Children and Adults With Hearing Loss When Using Amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015; 59(1):110-21. PMC: 4867924. DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0105. View

Kimlinger C, McCreery R, Lewis D . High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015; 26(2):128-37. PMC: 4397964. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.26.2.3. View

Brennan M, Souza P . Effects of expansion on consonant recognition and consonant audibility. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009; 20(2):119-27. PMC: 2784644. DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.20.2.5. View

Kirby B, Spratford M, Klein K, McCreery R . Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing. Ear Hear. 2018; 40(3):645-650. PMC: 6383507. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000645. View

10.

Henry B, Turner C . The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 113(5):2861-73. DOI: 10.1121/1.1561900. View

11.

Landsberger D, Stupak N, Aronoff J . Spectral-temporally modulated ripple test Lite for computeRless Measurement (SLRM): A Nonlinguistic Test for Audiology Clinics. Ear Hear. 2019; 40(5):1253-1255. PMC: 8919984. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000704. View

12.

Henry B, Turner C, Behrens A . Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 118(2):1111-21. DOI: 10.1121/1.1944567. View

13.

ZWICKER E, Schorn K . Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. Audiology. 1978; 17(2):120-40. DOI: 10.3109/00206097809080039. View

14.

Vogten L . Low-level pure-tone masking: a comparison of "tuning curves" obtained with simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 63(5):1520-7. DOI: 10.1121/1.381846. View

15.

Hopkins K, Khanom M, Dickinson A, Munro K . Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2014; 53(4):219-28. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.873956. View

16.

Swanepoel R, Oosthuizen D, Hanekom J . The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132(4):2652-62. DOI: 10.1121/1.4751543. View

17.

Wolfe J, John A, Schafer E, Nyffeler M, Boretzki M, Caraway T . Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2011; 50(6):396-404. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.551788. View

18.

Jurgens T, Clark N, Lecluyse W, Meddis R . Exploration of a physiologically-inspired hearing-aid algorithm using a computer model mimicking impaired hearing. Int J Audiol. 2016; 55(6):346-57. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1135352. View

19.

Gifford R, Hedley-Williams A, Spahr A . Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: a non-language based measure of performance outcomes. Int J Audiol. 2014; 53(3):159-64. PMC: 4067975. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.851800. View

20.

Supin AYa , Popov V, Milekhina O . Frequency resolving power of the human's hearing. Neurosci Lett. 1994; 165(1-2):195-8. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90743-9. View